Table 3. Odds ratio predicting likelihood of women delivering at an institution in Nepal, 2011.
| Model 1—Full Sample (N = 3997): Predicting institutional delivery = 1 and home delivery = 0 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Predictor variables | Odds Ratio | 95% CL | |
| Age at interview | 1.01 | 0.98 | 1.03 |
| Age at marriage (20+ = 1; else = 0) | 1.22 | 0.94 | 1.59 |
| Number of children (>2 children = 0) | |||
| One child | 2.77*** | 2.06 | 3.72 |
| Two children | 1.22 | 0.93 | 1.61 |
| Women’s education (no edu = 0) | |||
| Primary (1-5th grade) | 1.05 | 0.79 | 1.41 |
| Secondary+ (6th grade & more) | 1.40* | 1.05 | 1.88 |
| Husband’s education (no edu = 0) | |||
| Primary (1-5th grade) | 0.98 | 0.70 | 1.38 |
| Secondary+ (6th grade & more) | 1.06 | 0.76 | 1.48 |
| Wealth Index (Poor = 0) | |||
| Middle | 1.41* | 1.05 | 1.90 |
| Rich | 2.29*** | 1.64 | 3.19 |
| Religion (Hindu = 1; else = 0) | 1.08 | 0.72 | 1.60 |
| Urban (rural = 0) | 2.93*** | 2.23 | 3.85 |
| Ecological region (Hill = 0) | |||
| Mountain | 0.77 | 0.52 | 1.15 |
| Terai | 1.35* | 1.03 | 1.77 |
| Problem with money | 0.82 | 0.65 | 1.04 |
| Problem with Distance | 0.82 | 0.63 | 1.05 |
| Exposure to news media index | 1.10* | 1.01 | 1.20 |
| Exposed to health education programs (yes = 1; no = 0) | 0.92 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| # of antenatal care visits during last pregnancy (no antenatal care visits = 0) | |||
| 1 to 3 visits | 2.01** | 1.25 | 3.24 |
| 4 or more visits | 5.32*** | 3.28 | 8.61 |
| Knows about Cash Incentives program (yes = 1; no = 0) | 2.70*** | 1.59 | 4.59 |
| F value for Wald χ2 | 27.64*** | ||
| Max-rescaled R2 | .42 | ||
| C | .84 | ||
| Hosmer and Lemeshow χ2 GFI | 13.41 | ||
*p < .05
**p< .01
*** p < .001