Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 25.
Published in final edited form as: Caries Res. 2018 Jan 25;52(4):263–271. doi: 10.1159/000481414

Table 2.

Examples of comparisons of created phenotypes based on dmft/DMFT scores.

Comparison Sample Size (n)
No Caries vs. Low Caries 201 vs. 301
No Caries vs. High Caries 201 vs. 373
Low Caries vs. High Caries 301 vs. 373
No primary caries (dmft) vs. Low primary caries (dmft) 647 vs. 125
No primary caries (dmft) vs. High primary caries (dmft) 647 vs. 103
Low primary caries (dmft) vs. High primary caries (dmft) 125 vs. 103
No Caries vs. Very High Caries 201 vs. 128
Very High Caries vs. Low Caries 301 vs. 128
Very High Caries vs. High Caries 245 vs.128
Acute Increase in DMFT vs. No Acute Increase in DMFT 128 vs. 527
Acute Increase in DMFT vs. No Caries 128 vs. 201