Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Addict Behav. 2018 Apr 30;32(4):475–484. doi: 10.1037/adb0000357

Table 1.

Marijuana Use and Relationship Functioning, Descriptive Statistics over Four Waves

Variable Means (SD) Averaged α r’s range over assessment points 1

Baseline (T1) 4-month (T2) 7-month (T3) 10-month (T4)
Marijuana use frequency 5.41 (2.25) 5.11 (2.51) 4.78 (2.71) 4.73 (2.67) -- 0.60 < r < 0.80
Absolute marijuana use discrepancy 1.94 (2.37) 2.19 (2.53) 2.41 (2.63) 2.23 (2.62) -- 0.54 < r < 0.81
Concordant use 1 75/183 (41.0%) 67/155 (43.2%) 57/142 (40.1%) 58/141 (41.1%)
Relationship Satisfaction (IMS) 6.65 (1.38) 6.01 (2.07) 6.09 (2.04) 6.25 (1.96) 0.947 0.57 < r < 0.70
Partner Responsiveness (PAIR) 4.02 (0.85) 3.82 (1.02) 3.82 (1.00) 3.85 (1.01) 0.738 0.51 < r < 0.70
Negative social exchange (TENSE) 0.85 (0.65) 0.92 (0.77) 0.89 (0.82) 0.83 (0.77) 0.936 0.56 < r < 0.74
Conflict in close relationships 1.38 (1.05) 1.60 (1.34) 1.61 (1.40) 1.49 (1.35) 0.912 0.52 < r < 0.72
Psychological perpetration (CTS-2) 19.65 (21.58) 11.32 (17.67) 18.01 (18.06) 18.07 (18.07) 0.706 0.46 < r < 0.63
Psychological victimization (CTS-2) 20.07 (23.17) 12.60 (20.02) 13.16 (22.81) 11.61 (21.25) 0.750 0.37 < r < 0.64
Physical perpetration (CTS-2) 2.47 (7.28) 3.40 (12.49) 1.85 (6.73) 1.92 (10.07) 0.767 0.26 < r < 0.47
Physical victimization (CTS-2) 2.87 (8.13) 3.83 (14.47) 3.21 (13.50) 2.77 (12.00) 0.822 0.31 < r < 0.51

Note:

1

All p < .01.

1

Concordant use indicates percentage of couples with identical marijuana use frequency by female and male partner (discrepancy = 0).