Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Dec 20;21(3):364–372. doi: 10.1038/s41391-017-0009-6

Table 3.

Pathologic outcomes at radical prostatectomy.

Current Analysis Cohort (n=70) Original Trial Cohorts
TAPS (n=32) Neo-Abi (n=56) Neo-Enza (n=48)
N % N % N % N %
Pathologic T stage
pT0 4 5.7 2 6.3 4 7.1 1 2.1
pT2 27 38.6 21 65.6 22 39.3 15 31.3
pT3 39 55.7 9 28.1 30 53.6 32 66.7
Pathologic T Down-Stage*
Yes 10 14.3 - - - - - -
No 57 81.4 - - - - - -
Unknown 3 4.3 - - - - - -
Pathologic N Stage
N0 61 87.1 - - 46 82.1 41 85.4
N1 8 11.4 - - 10 17.9 7 14.6
Unknown 1 1.4 - - 0 0 0 0
Positive Margin
Yes 9 12.9 - - 8 14.3 9 18.8
No 61 87.1 - - 48 85.7 39 81.3
Seminal Vesicle Involvement
Yes 28 40.0 5 15.6 17 30.4 16 33.3
No 42 60.0 27 84.4 39 69.6 32 66.7
Largest Cross Section Dimension
≤0.5cm 11 15.7 - - - - - -
>0.5cm 55 78.6 - - - - - -
Unknown 4 5.7 - - - - - -
Pathologic Complete Response
Yes 4 5.7 2 6.3 4 7.1 1 2.1
No 66 94.3 30 93.7 52 92.9 47 97.9
*

Downstaging of clinical T stage as defined by AJCC staging system at diagnosis to pathologic T stage at radical prostatectomy. Improved from T1c to pT0 (N=2), T2a to pT0 (N=1), T2b to pT2a (N=1), T2c to pT0 (N=1), T3 to pT2 (N=1), T3a to pT2a (N=2), T3a to pT2c (N=1), T3b to pT3a (N=1).

- denotes not available.