Table 2.
Low conservation value | High conservation value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Low climate uncertainty | High climate uncertainty | Low climate uncertainty | High climate uncertainty | |
High climate vulnerability | Emphasize innovation | Emphasize innovation and prepare for surprises | Emphasize reserves and provide for flexibility | Emphasize reserves and plan for experimental approach |
Low climate vulnerability | Emphasize restoration | Emphasize restoration and prepare for surprises | Emphasize traditional reserves | Emphasize reserves and provide for flexibility |
Based on the framework of Belote et al.17 (Fig. 1), we adjust recommendations given certainty in predictions of climate exposure. In areas of low conservation value where restoration of active innovative management may be required to restore ecological functions and biodiversity, a high of uncertainty in climate exposure may lead to “surprises” in responses. In areas of high conservation values, where reserves may protect lands of high ecological integrity or importance, a high degree of climate uncertainty may require an acknowledgement of management flexibility or use of experimental approaches to adaptively maintain biodiversity and ecological function.