Table 2.
Meta-analytic results for the overall effect
| Inclusion | k | g | Q | I 2 (%) | +k | g′ | PET | PEESE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Including all depletionsa | 142 | 0.38***(0.31, 0.45) | 358.87*** | 60.67 | 31 | 0.24***(0.16, 0.32) | −0.18 | 0.05 |
| Only reliable depletions | 39 | 0.42***(0.32, 0.51) | 49.74 | 25.08 | 0 | 0.42***(0.32, 0.51) | 0.79*** | 0.56*** |
Including all depletions all experiment were included, Only reliable depletions only including experiments using attention essay, emotion video, and Stroop as the depleting task, k the number of effect sizes, g the weighted average standardized mean difference, Q Cochran’s Q statistic for statistical heterogeneity, I 2 percentage of variance due to sources other than sampling error, +k the number of experiments imputed by the trim and fill, g′ the (adjusted) estimation of the true effect after experiments have been imputed
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
aThe five experiments using transcription as the depleting task and the experiment using the difficult math problem were also included