Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 30;31:36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.03.027

Table 5.

Accuracy of NLST versus the HUNT Lung Cancer Model for lung cancer (LC) diagnosis within 6 years, using the same number of screenings as NLST in the CONOR ever-smokers with complete data. As compared with NLST criteria, our model's criteria identified 103 vs 69 out of 270 cases showing an improved sensitivity (38.14% vs 25.6%, P = 0.0216) and positive predictive value (4.95% vs 3.3%, P < 0.000001), with the same specificity (95.61% vs 95.5%, P = 0.7321) and similar negative predictive value (99.6% vs. 99.5%, P = 0.95374).

Criteriaa Participants with LC (N) Participants without LC (N) Participants total (N) Predictive value
NLST criteria 270 45,117 45,387
Criteria positive 69 TP (3·3%) 2012 FP (96·7%) 2081 PPV 3·3%
Criteria negative 201 FN (0·5%) 43,105 TN (99·5%) 43,306 NPV 99·5%
Sensitivity 25·6%
Specificity 95·5%
HUNT Lung Cancer Model criteria
Criteria positive 103 TP (4·95%) 1978 FP (95·05%) 2081 PPV 4·95%
Criteria negative 167 FN (0·4%) 43,139 TN (99·6%) 43,306 NPV 99·6%
Sensitivity 38·14%
Specificity 95·61%

FN = false negative; FP = false positive; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value; TN = true negative; TP = true positive.

a

NLST criteria for study entry included a history of cigarette smoking of at least 30 pack-years, age between 55 and 74 years and, for former smokers, cessation within the previous 15 years.