Table 2.
Characteristics of included studies
| References | Years | Patients (n) rUKA/pTKA | Mean age (years) rUKA/pTKA | Female rUKA/pTKA | Mean follow-up (years) | Mean BMI (kg/m2) rUKA/pTKA | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Järvenpää J [5] | 2010 | 21/28 | 74.9(7.4)/75.2(7.2) | 12/17 | 10.5 | 28.5(4)/30.5(4.4) | Hospital stay, ROM, WOMAC scores, revisions, complications, requirement of augments, stems, and bone grafts |
| Rancourt MF [9] | 2012 | 63/126 | 67.49(10.24)/66.71(9.77) | 45/90 | 3 | 31.6(6.15)/32.53(6.57) | Hospital stay, WOMAC scores, mean polyethylene thickness, requirement of augments, stems, and bone grafts |
| Lunebourg A [11] | 2015 | 48/48 | 71(9)/72(12) | 36/32 | 7 | 28(4)/28(4) | ROM, KSS, mean polyethylene thickness, revisions, complications, requirement of augments, stems, and bone grafts |
| Becker R [10] | 2004 | 28/28 | 71.5(6.8)/71.5(6.6) | 23/23 | 4.6 | 31.2(3.2)/31.1(4.4) | ROM, WOMAC scores, KSS |
| Cross MB [12] | 2014 | 49/97 | 61.5/58.9 | 30/50 | 4.8 | 31.65/32.76 | hospital stay, ROM, KSS, revisions, complications, requirement of augments, stems, and bone grafts |
rUKA revised unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, pTKA primary total knee arthroplasty, BMI body mass index, ROM range of motion, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, KSS Knee Society Score