Table 4.
Comparison of sum score, health-state estimates based on Rasch (holistic MAPR) model, MAPR model (LLTM). The absolute differences in outcome between the Rasch model (holistic MAPR) and the LLTM (MAPR) model are due to scaling and should be ignored
| EQ-5D-3 L health statea | Sum score | Rasch (Holistic MAPR) model | MAPR (LLTM) model |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11111 | 2 | b | 0.000 |
| 11211 | 57 | 4.761 | −0.548 |
| 21111 | 60 | 4.555 | −0.274 |
| 11121 | 63 | 4.358 | −0.752 |
| 11112 | 76 | 3.575 | − 1.527 |
| 12111 | 79 | 3.406 | −1.626 |
| 11113 | 122 | 0.956 | −3.006 |
| 11131 | 129 | 0.482 | −3.548 |
| 11113 | 130 | 0.410 | −3.352 |
| 13311 | 142 | −0.605 | −4.306 |
| 22222 | 142 | −0.605 | −4.728 |
| 32211 | 151 | −1.733 | −5.083 |
| 11133 | 152 | −1.903 | −6.900 |
| 32313 | 156 | −2.780 | −9.366 |
| 33323 | 157 | −3.087 | −12.045 |
| 23232 | 157 | −3.087 | −9.451 |
| 32223 | 159 | −3.960 | −9.187 |
| 33333 | 160 | −4.742 | −14.841 |
aCode is representing the five attributes, each with three levels, of the EQ-5D-3 L instrument
bNo estimate is obtained since the data matrix is ill-conditioned when this state is included