Table 7.
System usability scale (SUS) scores of the traditional systematic review format
| Mean a (SD) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Statement | Traditional Format | |
| HCMs (n = 5) |
PMs (n = 6) |
|
| I think that I would like to use this document frequently | 3.6 (0.6) | 2.8 (1.2) |
| I found this document unnecessarily complex | 3.4 (1.3) | 3.2 (1.0) |
| I thought this document was easy to use | 2.6 (1.3) | 3.0 (1.1) |
| I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this document | 2.0 (0.7) | 2.2 (1.6) |
| I found the various functions of this document (ex: the tables, boxes, graphics, etc.) were very well integrated | 2.6 (0.9) | 3.0 (1.6) |
| I thought there was too much inconsistency in the format of this document | 2.2 (0.5) | 3.3 (0.5) |
| I would imagine that most people would learn to use this document very quickly | 2.4 (0.9) | 2.7 (1.2) |
| I found this document very cumbersome to use | 3.0 (1.0) | 3.0 (1.1) |
| I felt very confident using this document | 4.0 (1.2) | 3.5 (1.2) |
| I need to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this document | 2.4 (1.1) | 2.0 (1.1) |
| Calculated Score | 55.5 (16.5) | 55.8 (20.8) |
aScoring based on a scale from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. At least 5 items were reversed coded in order to calculate the mean