Table 2.
Days after treatment | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 14 | 18 | 22 | 25 | |
Pipe height | 0.02* | 0.261ns | 0.01* | 0.01* | <0.01** | <0.01** | <0.01** | <0.01** | <0.01** |
Soil depth | <0.01** | <0.01** | <0.01** | <0.01** | <0.01** | <0.01** | <0.01** | <0.01** | <0.01** |
Accession | 0.88ns | 0.97ns | 0.69ns | 0.95ns | 0.77ns | 0.29ns | 0.81ns | 0.35ns | 0.33ns |
Pipe height × Accession | 0.99ns | 1.00ns | 0.99ns | 0.81ns | 0.83ns | 0.10ns | 0.57ns | 0.16ns | 1.00ns |
Soil depth × Accession | 0.71ns | 1.00ns | 0.99ns | 0.79ns | 0.75ns | 0.35ns | 0.49ns | <0.01** | 1.00ns |
The significant effects of pipe height, soil depth and accession on VSWC were shown in p-values. The effects of interactions between pipe height × accession and soil depth × accession were also shown. In the ANOVA table, **, *, and ns represent p < 0.01, p < 0.05, and non-significant, respectively.