Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 16;41(7):1478–1485. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1683

Table 2.

Association of baseline A1C and wound healing in multivariable Cox models

Unadjusted (n = 584) Model 1* (n = 583) Model 2 (n = 528)
Baseline A1C N HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value
6.5–8.0% 162 1.00 Ref 1.00 Ref 1.00 Ref
<6.5% 149 1.00 0.69–1.47 0.96 0.99 0.69–1.43 0.96 0.97 0.65–1.44 0.89
>8.0% 298 1.18 0.89–1.58 0.26 1.13 0.83–1.54 0.44 0.97 0.70–1.36 0.87

N, number of wounds.

P values <0.05 are statistically significant.

*Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, and race; one observation was dropped due to missing race.

†Model 2 adjusted for age, sex, race, smoking status, neuropathy (LOPS), prior amputation, quartiles of insulin dose (units/kg/day), metformin use, sulfonylurea use, wound intervention (surgery vs. wound care only), eGFR category, kidney transplant, A1C target (<7.5% vs. ≥7.5%), and antibiotic use; 56 observations were dropped from model 2: 54 missing eGFR, 1 missing race, and 1 missing insulin dose.