Skip to main content
. 2018 May 1;41(7):1501–1509. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1896

Table 2.

Association of MetS with neurocognitive function among Hispanics/Latinos of diverse backgrounds

β (SE)
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
B-SEVLT-sum
 MetS −0.07 (0.025)** 0.42 (0.162)* 0.53 (0.153)***
 Age −0.03 (0.002)*** −0.02 (0.002)*** −0.02 (0.002)***
 MetS*age −0.01 (0.003)** −0.01 (0.003)***
B-SEVLT-recall
 MetS −0.02 (0.022) 0.47 (0.158)** 0.58 (0.149)***
 Age −0.03 (0.001)*** −0.02 (0.002)*** −0.02 (0.002)***
 MetS*age −0.01 (0.003)** −0.01 (0.003)***
WF
 MetS −0.15 (0.028)*** −0.15 (0.185) −0.09 (0.029)**
 Age −0.01 (0.002)*** −0.01 (0.003)*** −0.004 (0.002)*
 MetS*age 0.00 (0.003) NA
DSS
 MetS −0.15 (0.022)*** −0.23 (0.185) −0.09 (0.021)***
 Age −0.04 (0.002)*** −0.04 (0.003)*** −0.03 (0.001)***
 MetS*age 0.0015 (0.003) NA
Global cognition
 MetS −0.07 (0.023)** 0.37 (0.158)* 0.50 (0.144)***
 Age −0.03 (0.002)*** −0.03 (0.002)*** −0.02 (0.002)***
MetS*age −0.01 (0.003)** −0.01 (0.003)***
OR (95% CI)
Low mental status (SIS ≤4)
  MetS 1.13 (0.95; 1.34) 1.71 (0.48; 6.16) 1.07 (0.90; 1.29)
  Age 1.05 (1.04; 1.06)*** 1.05 (1.03; 1.07)*** 1.05 (1.04; 1.06)***
  MetS*age 0.99 (0.97; 1.02) NA

Estimates based on survey-generalized linear regression models assuming a Gaussian distribution for continuous outcomes (Z scores) and logistic distribution for low mental status. MetS was defined using the IDF specifications. Model 1: age and sex adjusted; model 2: model 1 plus age*MetS interaction; model 3: model 2 plus education, Hispanic/Latino background, and CES-D-10 scale.

*P < 0.05;

**P < 0.01;

***P < 0.001;

↟Interaction excluded because not significant in model 2.