Table 4. Results of environmental models for various extraction masks showing the R2 value and Spearman’s rank correlation value (r) between model predicted and observed prevalence values.
| Mask* | R2 (RMSE) | r (p-value) | R2 (RMSE) | r (p-value) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landsat 8 data | Sentinel-2 data | |||
| None {1} | 0.14 (9.36) | 0.49 (< 0.01) | 0.14 (9.65) | 0.33 (< 0.01) |
| Unpopulated {2} | 0.17 (9.07) | 0.46 (< 0.01) | 0.14 (9.80) | 0.28 (< 0.01) |
| All WBs {4} | 0.15 (9.62) | 0.48 (< 0.01) | 0.14 (9.70) | 0.40 (< 0.01) |
| Unmined WBs {5} | 0.12 (9.68) | 0.51 (< 0.01) | 0.12 (9.71) | 0.34 (< 0.01) |
| SWAPs {6} | 0.15 (9.47) | 0.76 (< 0.01) | 0.13 (9.43) | 0.67 (< 0.01) |
* The number in brackets refers to the mask in Fig 3