Table 3.
Pollutant | Increment | Model 1a | Model 2a | Model 3a | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean difference | (95% CI) | Mean difference | (95% CI) | Mean difference | (95% CI) | ||
Performance-basedb | |||||||
(, ) | (, ) | (, ) | |||||
(, ) | (, ) | (, ) | |||||
abs | 0.31 | (, ) | (, ) | (, 0.05) | |||
0.09 | (, 0.33) | 0.12 | (, 0.35) | 0.16 | (, 0.39) | ||
(, ) | (, ) | (, ) | |||||
(, ) | (, ) | (, ) | |||||
Self-reportedc | |||||||
0.03 | (, 0.30) | 0.10 | (, 0.35) | 0.21 | (, 0.49) | ||
0.04 | (, 0.27) | 0.13 | (, 0.35) | 0.23 | (, 0.47) | ||
abs | 0.31 | (, 0.22) | 0.03 | (, 0.27) | 0.10 | (, 0.35) | |
(, 0.18) | (, 0.20) | (, 0.22) | |||||
0.03 | (, 0.23) | 0.08 | (, 0.27) | 0.16 | (, 0.37) | ||
0.00 | (, 0.18) | 0.09 | (, 0.26) | 0.19 | (, 0.37) |
Note: Associations are presented as mean differences in physical performance score with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for an interquartile range increase in air pollution exposure and were derived from models with exposure and exposure–time since baseline interaction.
Model 1: Adjusted for age and sex; Model 2. as in Model 1, also adjusted for education level, smoking, alcohol consumption, depression, physical activity, and cross-products of time since baseline with education, alcohol consumption and depression; Model 3: as in Model 2, also adjusted for area-level socioeconomic status defined as the status score of the four-digit postal code area.
participants, observations.
participants, observations.