Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 19;126(1):017009. doi: 10.1289/EHP2239

Table 3.

Associations between physical performance (performance-based and self-reported) and residential air pollution exposure from linear mixed model analyses for an interquartile range increase in exposure.

Pollutant Increment Model 1a Model 2a Model 3a
Mean difference (95% CI) Mean difference (95% CI) Mean difference (95% CI)
Performance-basedb
NO2 8.9μg/m3 0.32 (0.51, 0.14) 0.31 (0.49, 0.13) 0.22 (0.42, 0.03)
NOx 13.5μg/m3 0.30 (0.46, 0.14) 0.27 (0.43, 0.12) 0.20 (0.36, 0.04)
PM2.5 abs 0.31 105/m 0.21 (0.39, 0.04) 0.21 (0.37, 0.04) 0.13 (0.30, 0.05)
PM2.5 1.4μg/m3 0.09 (0.15, 0.33) 0.12 (0.11, 0.35) 0.16 (0.08, 0.39)
PM10 1.5μg/m3 0.28 (0.42, 0.14) 0.28 (0.42, 0.15) 0.22 (0.37, 0.08)
PMcoarse 0.8μg/m3 0.27 (0.39, 0.14) 0.25 (0.37, 0.13) 0.19 (0.32, 0.06)
Self-reportedc
NO2 8.9μg/m3 0.03 (0.24, 0.30) 0.10 (0.16, 0.35) 0.21 (0.07, 0.49)
NOx 13.5μg/m3 0.04 (0.19, 0.27) 0.13 (0.08, 0.35) 0.23 (0.00, 0.47)
PM2.5 abs 0.31 105/m 0.02 (0.27, 0.22) 0.03 (0.20, 0.27) 0.10 (0.15, 0.35)
PM2.5 1.4μg/m3 0.17 (0.52, 0.18) 0.13 (0.45, 0.20) 0.11 (0.44, 0.22)
PM10 1.5μg/m3 0.03 (0.17, 0.23) 0.08 (0.11, 0.27) 0.16 (0.05, 0.37)
PMcoarse 0.8μg/m3 0.00 (0.18, 0.18) 0.09 (0.08, 0.26) 0.19 (0.00, 0.37)

Note: Associations are presented as mean differences in physical performance score with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for an interquartile range increase in air pollution exposure and were derived from models with exposure and exposure–time since baseline interaction.

a

Model 1: Adjusted for age and sex; Model 2. as in Model 1, also adjusted for education level, smoking, alcohol consumption, depression, physical activity, and cross-products of time since baseline with education, alcohol consumption and depression; Model 3: as in Model 2, also adjusted for area-level socioeconomic status defined as the status score of the four-digit postal code area.

b

N=1,695 participants, n=4,105 observations.

c

N=1,758 participants, n=4,405 observations.