Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 22;13(6):e0198349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198349

Table 2. Comparison of performance between task-fMRI and resting state fMRI.

A. Cause Of Failure rs-fMRI (n = 232) task-based fMRI (n = 83)
Patient Motion 14 (6.0%) 0 (0%)
Susceptibility artifact 6 (2.6%) 0 (0%)
Unable to follow commands 0 (0%) 10 (12%)
No activation 2 (.9%) 20 (24%)
Technical failure NOS / did not pass QA 3 (1.2%) 2 (2.5%)
Anatomic misregistration to atlas 3 (1.2%) 0 (0%)
Total 28 (13%) 32 (38.5%)
B. Performance Between rs-fMFI and task-fMRI
Successful rs-fMRI Failed task-fMRI
Successful task-fMRI 54 25
Failed task-fMRI 29 3