Table 2. Comparison of performance between task-fMRI and resting state fMRI.
A. Cause Of Failure | rs-fMRI (n = 232) | task-based fMRI (n = 83) |
Patient Motion | 14 (6.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Susceptibility artifact | 6 (2.6%) | 0 (0%) |
Unable to follow commands | 0 (0%) | 10 (12%) |
No activation | 2 (.9%) | 20 (24%) |
Technical failure NOS / did not pass QA | 3 (1.2%) | 2 (2.5%) |
Anatomic misregistration to atlas | 3 (1.2%) | 0 (0%) |
Total | 28 (13%) | 32 (38.5%) |
B. Performance Between rs-fMFI and task-fMRI | ||
Successful rs-fMRI | Failed task-fMRI | |
Successful task-fMRI | 54 | 25 |
Failed task-fMRI | 29 | 3 |