Table 4.
Comparative analysis of the performance of XRPI, RPISeq-RF, RPISeq-SVM, RPI-Pred, and lncPro on NPInter v3.0 golden dataset.
| Method | H. sapiens | M. musculus | D. melanogaster | S. cerevisiae | Total (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XRPI-2825 | 1533/1560 | 225/237 | 18/19 | 200/204 | 1976/2020 (97.8%) |
| XRPI-390 | 1498/1560 | 216/237 | 16/19 | 202/204 | 1932/2020 (95.6%) |
| RPISeq-SVM | 1347/1560 | 219/237 | 17/19 | 202/204 | 1785/2020 (88.4%) |
| RPISeq-RF | 1483/1560 | 234/237 | 18/19 | 201/204 | 1936/2020 (95.8%) |
| RPI-Pred | 1529/1560 | 201/237 | 19/19 | 204/204 | 1955/2020 (96.8%) |
| lncPro | 784/1560 | 191/237 | 15/19 | 131/204 | 1121/2020 (55.5%) |
$The number of correctly predicted RPIs is shown. In parenthesis is the prediction accuracy.