Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 22;8:9568. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27907-y

Table 1.

Effect of GAL-1 treatment on weight loss and renal function induced by IR injury.

Parameter Group
SHAM IR IR + DEXA IR + GAL-1
Weight loss (g) −18.3 ± 10.6 −11.7 ± 32.1 −28.8 ± 18.2 −38.0 ± 32.2
Plasma creatinine (mg/dL) 0.60 ± 0.12 2.47 ± 2.37++ 0.65 ± 0.12 0.50 ± 0.07
Creatinine clearance (mL/min/100 g) 0.29 ± 0.13 0.16 ± 0.18+ 0.35 ± 0.07 0.44 ± 0.17
Urinary output (mL/24 h) 12.2 ± 2.4 7.3 ± 3.0** 14.3 ± 1.9 11.8 ± 3.2
Sodium excretion fraction (%) 0.22 ± 0.04 0.54 ± 0.20*** 0.19 ± 0.05 0.21 ± 0.05
Potassium excretion fraction (%) 39.4 ± 14.7 65.6 ± 32.0* 29.0 ± 7.0 32.8 ± 8.9
BUN (mg/dL) 18.0 ± 2.7 46.0 ± 24.9 27.0 ± 6.7 21.6 ± 2.8+
TBARS (mMol/L) 112.6 ± 19.1$ 155.5 ± 24.9 207.5 ± 19.0 174.7 ± 12.6
KIM-1 (pg/mL) 213.5 ± 76.2 982.9 ± 96.7# 943.9 ± 117.0# 814.9 ± 43.7

aData represent the mean ± SD. N = 6 rats.

bThe IR group showed a reduction in renal function in comparison with the SHAM, DEXA or GAL-1-treated IR groups, as detected by the analysis of different renal parameters. No difference in weight loss was observed among groups (p > 0.05). One-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test.

+p < 0.05 and ++p < 0.01, IR vs IR + GAL-1.

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001, IR vs all groups.

p < 0.05, IR vs SHAM.

$p < 0.05, SHAM vs all groups.

#p < 0.05, IR and IR + DEXA vs SHAM.