Table 1.
Treatments | Locomotor activity count/10 min | Hanging latency time/90 sec | Time of fall / 90 sec | %Spontaneous alterations |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 252±29.1 | 22.3±3.16 | 58.2±8.36 | 69.2±2.93 |
Sham Control | 185±18.5 | 19.2±1.01 | 39.8±5.51 | 63.0±3.65 |
BCCA Control | 77.0±6.03** | 8.17±0.872** | 15.0±1.53* | 40.3±4.98*** |
BCCA+NAC | 175±17.5** | 16.2±0.946* | 33.5±3.59 | 62.2±4.59** |
BCCA+PPX | 180±15.7* | 27.7±3.28 | 57.8±3.28* | |
BCCA+NAC+PPX | 243±12.6*** | 20.2±1.40*** | 45.8±2.54*** | 68.3±2.32*** |
Results were expressed in mean ± SEM, (n=6) in each group, ‘*’ ‘**’ and ‘***’ were significantly different at P<0.05, P<0.01 and P<0.001 respectively, in comparison with bilateral common carotid artery ligation groupBilateral common carotid artery ligation group was compared with sham control; combination treatment group was compared with Individual treatment groups