Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun;21(6):569–576. doi: 10.22038/IJBMS.2018.22647.5756

Table 1.

Behavioral assessment

Treatments Locomotor activity count/10 min Hanging latency time/90 sec Time of fall / 90 sec %Spontaneous alterations
Control 252±29.1 22.3±3.16 58.2±8.36 69.2±2.93
Sham Control 185±18.5 19.2±1.01 39.8±5.51 63.0±3.65
BCCA Control 77.0±6.03** 8.17±0.872** 15.0±1.53* 40.3±4.98***
BCCA+NAC 175±17.5** 16.2±0.946* 33.5±3.59 62.2±4.59**
BCCA+PPX 180±15.7* 27.7±3.28 57.8±3.28*
BCCA+NAC+PPX 243±12.6*** 20.2±1.40*** 45.8±2.54*** 68.3±2.32***

Results were expressed in mean ± SEM, (n=6) in each group, ‘*’ ‘**’ and ‘***’ were significantly different at P<0.05, P<0.01 and P<0.001 respectively, in comparison with bilateral common carotid artery ligation groupBilateral common carotid artery ligation group was compared with sham control; combination treatment group was compared with Individual treatment groups