Skip to main content
. 2018 May 4;7(10):e008974. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008974

Table 2.

Cumulative Incidence of CVD and Non‐CVD Mortality in Relation to Frailty Status Using Kaplan–Meier versus Competing‐Risk Method

Frailty Status Cumulative Incidence, % (95% CI)
Kaplan–Meier Method Competing Risk Method
5 y 10 y 5 y 10 y
CVD Mortality
Robust 2.4 (2.2–2.6) 8.0 (7.0–9.0) 2.3 (2.1–2.6) 7.4 (6.6–8.4)
Intermediate 5.3 (4.9–5.8) 15.3 (13.9–16.8) 5.0 (4.6–5.5) 13.1 (12.0–14.3)
Frail 13.2 (10.9–15.7) 32.5 (27.3–37.8) 11.7 (9.8–13.9) 23.8 (20.2–27.6)
Non‐CVD mortality
Robust 4.6 (4.1–5.2) 15.7 (13.8–17.6) 4.6 (4.1–5.1) 15.0 (13.3–16.8)
Intermediate 9.9 (9.0–10.8) 27.4 (25.3–29.6) 9.6 (8.8–10.5) 25.4 (23.5–27.4)
Frail 22.9 (19.4–26.7) 48.6 (43.6–53.4) 21.4 (18.1–24.8) 41.5 (36.9–45.9)

CI indicates confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease.