Skip to main content
. 2018 May 25;7(11):e008730. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008730

Table 2.

Procedural Factors in Coronary Bifurcation Trials

Procedural Factors Nordic10 2013a BBK111, 12 2015 PERFECT13 2015 Nordic‐Baltic Bifurcation14 IV 2015 BBC115, 16 2016a EBC217 2016 Smart‐Strategy18 2016 DK Crush II4 2017a DK Crush V5 2017
True bifurcation, (%, involves SB) 72 68.3 86.6 100 83.2 100 66.3 100 100
Two‐stent technique (%) Crush (50), culotte (21), other (29) T‐stent Crush (99) Culotte (67),
T‐stenting (7), other (26)
Crush (68), culotte (30), other (2) Culotte TAP DK Crush DK Crush
Stent type (%) SES SES SES (58),
EES (28),
ZES (9),
other (5)
SES (50),
EES (50)
PES BES (100) SES (47),
EES (29),
other (24)
Excel (rapamycin‐eluting stents with biodegradeable polymer) N/A
FKB (%, simple/complex) 32/74 100/100 79/96 36.1/91.2 29/76 94/96 26/69 79.2/100 78.9/99.6
IVUS N/A N/A 95.7 N/A N/A N/A 97.7 47.0 41.7
Procedure time (min, simple/complex) 62/76 51/56 49/54 N/A 57/78 23/39 N/A 37/38 66/82
Contrast, mL 233/283 204/203 347/350 N/A N/A 246/269 N/A 137/149 191/227
SB stent (min, simple/complex) 4.4/95 18.8/97 28.2/97.7 3.7/96 2.8/98 16/97 7/30 29/100 47.1/100
MV lesion length, mm 16 21.3 28.4 N/A N/A 18 N/A 27.1 48.7
SB lesion length, mm 5 10.2 9.3 5.8 N/A 10.3 N/A 15.0 30.4
SB diameter stenosis, % N/A 53.8 55.2 45.8 N/A 54.5 N/A N/A 65.6

BES indicates biolimus‐eluting stent; DK, double‐kissing; EES, everolimus‐eluting stent; FKB, final kissing balloon; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; MV, main vessel; N/A, not available; PES, paclitaxel‐eluting stent; SB, side branch; SES, sirolimus‐eluting stent; TAP, T stenting and small protrusion; ZES, zotarolimus‐eluting stent.

a

5 year follow‐up results.