Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 12;7(8):e008190. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008190

Table 2.

Associations of Plasma Choline and Betaine With Incident AF Risk in HUSK, WECAC, and NORVITa

Plasma Metabolite Unadjusted Adjusted for Sex and Age Multivariable Modelb
HR (95% CI) P Value HR (95% CI) P Value HR (95% CI) P Value
HUSK (n=6949)
Choline 1.45 (1.33‐1.57) <0.001 1.12 (1.02‐1.22) 0.013 1.11 (1.02‐1.22) 0.015
Betaine 1.37 (1.26‐1.49) <0.001 1.13 (1.02‐1.24) 0.014 1.18 (1.07‐1.29) 0.001
WECAC (n=3809)
Choline 1.37 (1.24‐1.51) <0.001 1.17 (1.05‐1.29) 0.004 1.14 (1.03‐1.27) 0.013
Betaine 1.16 (1.05‐1.28) 0.002 1.07 (0.96‐1.18) 0.22 1.10 (0.99‐1.22) 0.08
NORVIT (n=3733)
Choline 1.30 (1.22‐1.39) <0.001 1.17 (1.08‐1.26) <0.001 1.15 (1.06‐1.24) <0.001
Betaine 1.14 (1.06‐1.24) 0.001 1.14 (1.06‐1.24) 0.001 1.18 (1.09‐1.29) <0.001
Pooled resultsc
Choline 1.36 (1.30‐1.42) <0.001 1.15 (1.09‐1.21) <0.001 1.13 (1.08‐1.19) <0.001
Betaine 1.22 (1.16‐1.29) <0.001 1.12 (1.06‐1.18) <0.001 1.16 (1.10‐1.22) <0.001

AF indicates atrial fibrillation; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; HUSK, Hordaland Health Study; NORVIT, Norwegian B‐Vitamin Trial; WECAC, Western Norway Coronary Angiography Cohort.

a

HRs (95% CIs) are reported per 1‐SD increment of natural log‐transformed plasma levels.

b

Models were adjusted for sex, age (continuous), BMI (continuous), diabetes mellitus (yes/no), hypertension (yes/no), and smoking (yes/no).

c

The results across the 3 cohorts were pooled using an inverse variance–weighted, fixed‐effect meta‐analysis.