Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 23;6:115. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0501-9

Table 1.

Summary statistics of sequences analysed including average OTU numbers detected and microbial diversity covered. For each chicken breed or line, the sequencing reads of all three primer pairs were merged and OTUs were clustered at > 97% similarity using QIIME

Location Breed/line Total sequences Av. sequences/ sample Av. no. OTUs Average microbial diversity covered (% Good’s coverage)
1 Aseel 839,375 55,958 1134 94.6
Kadaknath 1,042,538 69,503 816 95.9
Cobb400 679,158 45,277 1273 94.1
2 Aseel 2,775,511 185,034 735 95.7
Kadaknath 2,548,471 164,390 833 95.6
Ross 308 2,465,845 169,898 645 97.0