Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 20;21(2):182–189. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2018.21.2.182

Table 4. Changes in femur/spine BMD compared to the baseline in the intention-to-treat population during letrozole treatment.

BMD Baseline* Months p-value
12 24 36
Femur BMD
 Total
 N 891 751 645 288 < 0.0001
 Mean −0.21 −0.38 −0.52 −0.46 < 0.0001
 SD 1.07 1.09 1.03 0.93 0.0031§
p-valueII - < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001
Calcium -
 N 165 144 134 52 0.3707
 Mean −0.49 −0.66 −0.88 −0.69 < 0.0001**
 SD 1.12 1.13 1.02 0.97 0.0066§
p-valueII - < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.0001
Non-calcium
 N 726 607 511 236 < 0.0001
 Mean −0.14 −0.32 −0.43 −0.41
 SD 1.05 1.07 1.02 0.92
p-valueII - < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001
Spine BMD
 Total
 N 887 752 644 286 < 0.0001
 Mean −0.44 −0.76 −0.92 −0.84 < 0.0001
 SD 1.16 1.21 1.13 1.06 < 0.0001§
p-valueII - < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001
Calcium
 N 162 145 134 51 0.1060
 Mean −0.79 −1.09 −1.36 −1.25 < 0.0001**
 SD 1.06 1.10 0.97 1.00 0.0010§
p-valueII - < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.0001
Non-calcium
 N 725 607 510 235 < 0.0001§
 Mean −0.36 −0.69 −0.81 −0.75
 SD 1.17 1.23 1.14 1.05
p-valueII - < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.0001

BMD=bone mineral density; SD=standard deviation.

*p=0.0001 for equality of mean baseline femur/spine BMD between the calcium and non-calcium groups using the Student t-test; For equality of mean femur/spine BMD across visits using the generalized estimating equation (GEE); For a linear trend test of mean femur/spine BMD across visits using GEE analysis; §For a quadratic trend test of mean femur/spine BMD across visits using GEE analysis; For comparisons of mean femur/spine BMD changes between baseline and each follow-up visit using contrasts within the GEE; For an interaction effect between the calcium/non-calcium group and visits using the GEE; **For overall equality of mean femur/spine BMD between the calcium and non-calcium groups using the GEE.