Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun;18(2):227–236.

Table 3.

Estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for multivariable regression analysis of two-year areal bone mineral density (BMD) change at the lumbar spine (L2-4), femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH) for: A. never (N-CHC) versus ever (E-CHC) use of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC); and B. age at first CHC use, in all women in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) Youth Cohort (ages 16-24 years) and in Adolescent (ages 16-19 years) and Young Adult (aged 20-24 years) sub-cohorts with 95 percent confidence intervals (95% CI). Results in bold are statistically significant.

A. +Adjusted 2-y BMD change estimates (95% CI) for N-CHC users versus E-CHC users
CaMos Youth Cohort 16-24 years Adolescent 16-19 years Young Adult 20-24 years
estimate 95% CI estimate 95% CI estimate 95% CI
L1-L4 0.002 (-0.104; 0.091) 0.004 (-0.008; 0.015) -0.007 (-0.020; 0.006)
FN -0.001 (-0.010; 0.008) 0.009 (-0.002; 0.021) -0.021 (-0.036; -0.006)
TH -0.001 (-0.009; 0.006) 0.002 (-0.008; 0.012) -0.013 (-0.026; 0.000)
B. +Adjusted 2-year BMD change estimates (95% CI) for age CHC started among CHC users
CaMos Youth Cohort 16-24 years Adolescent 16-19 years Young Adult 16-24 years
estimate 95% CI estimate 95% CI estimate 95% CI
L1-L4 0.001 (-0.001; 0.003) -0.001 (-0.005; 0.004) -0.007 (-0.020; 0.006)
FN 0.000 (-0.002; 0.002) -0.001 (-0.005; 0.003) 0.000 (-0.002; 0.003)
TH 0.000 (-0.002; 0.002) 0.000 (-0.004; 0.004) 0.000 (-0.002; 0.002)

+ Adjusted for baseline age, height, BMI, menarche age, total calcium intake, 24 hour physical activity (kcal/d), alcohol consumption, current smoking, BMD and Body Mass Index change over 2-years.