Skip to main content
. 2018 May 31;175(14):2897–2910. doi: 10.1111/bph.14185

Table 1.

Structures and in vitro pharmacological profiles of E‐162 and TR‐7 in binding and functional assays (cAMP) at human H3 receptors, H4 receptors, and H1 receptors

In vitro assays Compounds
E‐162 TR‐7

chemical structure image

chemical structure image

H3R Binding assay K i = 55 ± 15 nMa K i = 13 200 ± 800 nMa
Functional cAMP assay IC50 = 165 nMb nt
H4R Binding assay K i = 58 500 ± 6600 nMc K i = 203 ± 65 nMe
Functional cAMP assay nt IC50 = 512 nMf
H1R Binding assay K i = 1824 ± 203 nMd nt
Functional assay in guinea pig ileum nt pA2 = 6.3g

nt, not tested.

a

[3H]N α‐Methylhistamine binding assay performed with cell membrane preparation of HEK293 cells stably expressing the human histamine H3 receptor. Data are means ± SD of three independent experiments.

b

cAMP accumulation assay in HEK293 cells expressing human histamine H3 receptors, co‐treated with forskolin, (R)‐(−)‐α‐methylhistamine and the tested compound.

c

[3H]Histamine binding assay in membrane preparations of CHO cells stably expressing the human histamine H4 receptor. Data are means ± SD of three independent experiments.

d

[3H]Pyrilamine binding assay performed with CHO‐K1 cells stably transfected with the human H1 receptor. Data are means ± SD of three independent experiments.

e

[3H]Histamine binding assay performed with membrane preparation of Sf9 cells expressing the human H4 receptor, co‐expressed with G‐protein Gαi2 and Gβ1γ2 subunits (data from Łażewska et al., 2014).

f

cAMP accumulation assay in CHO cells expressing the human H4 receptor, co‐treated with forskolin, histamine and the tested compound (Łażewska et al., 2014).

g

Data from Mogilski et al. (2017).