Table 2.
Perceived influence on practice | Areas for improvement |
---|---|
Highlighted problems with assessments and processes | Little use of ‘check and challenge’ process |
Changes primarily to delirium and mobility assessments, changes to equipment use | Overlap with existing practices—‘another piece of paper’ |
Space to reflect and focus attention on frailty | Difficulties spreading outside the initial improvement team |
Worked as a prompt to identify things being missed | The tool itself did not prompt any action or close loops—depends on individual action |
Easy and quick to use—some ambiguities allowed localisation | Some items still ambiguous and open to interpretation |