Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 13;12(6):e0006577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006577

Table 1. Summary of included studies with outcome of GAS infection, including findings, study type and quality assessment.

Crowding Dwelling characteristics and facilities Education Employment Income Nutrition Socioeconomic status
Number of studies, n 14 7 1 0 3 0 6
Association with GAS infection, n (%)  
Positive 6 (42.9) 4 (57.1) 0 (0.0) NA 1 (33.3) NA 3 (50.0)
Mixed 2 (14.3) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (33.3) 0 (0.0)
Possible 1 (7.1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (33.3) 0 (0.0)
No association 5 (35.7) 3 (42.9) 1 (14.3) 0 (0.0) 3 (50.0)
Study type, n (%)  
Case control 1 (7.1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) NA 0 (0.0) NA 0 (0.0)
Case series 1 (7.1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Cohort 6 (42.9) 2 (28.6) 0 (0.0) 1 (33.3) 2 (33.3)
Control trial 1 (7.1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Cross section 4 (28.6) 2 (28.6) 1 (14.3) 2 (66.7) 2 (33.3)
Ecologic 1 (7.1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (33.3)
Randomised control trial 0 (0.0) 3 (42.9) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Quality assessment, n (%)  
Good 1 (7.1) 1 (14.3) 0 (0.0) NA 0 (0.0) NA 1 (16.7)
Fair to good 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (16.7)
Fair 2 (14.3) 1 (14.3) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (16.7)
Poor to fair 3 (21.4) 2 (28.6) 0 (0.0) 1 (33.3) 2 (33.3)
Poor 8 (57.1) 3 (42.9) 1 (14.3)   2 (66.7)   3 (50.0)