Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 29;23(2):278. doi: 10.3390/molecules23020278

Table 5.

ABTS radical scavenging activity (mM TE 100 g−1 DW), DPPH radical scavenging activity (mg AAE 100 g−1 DW), and FRAP (mM Fe2+ 100 g−1 DW) of the flesh, peel, and whole tuber of different yacon cultivars.

Cultivar ABTS Radicals Scavenging Activity (mM TE 100 g−1 DW) DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity (mg AAE 100 g−1 DW) FRAP (mM Fe2+ 100 g−1 DW)
Flesh Peel Whole Tuber Flesh Peel Whole Tuber Flesh Peel Whole Tuber
Cajamarca 376.40 Da ± 0.79 262.29 Cb ± 0.14 371.48 ABCa ± 3.50 1498.64 Aa ± 3.06 1513.45 Aa ± 9.88 1473.92 Ba ± 16.20 17,495.62 Bc ± 178.98 28,222.52 ABa ± 73.17 19,762.35 Eb ± 55.30
Cusco 384.81 Ca ± 0.13 266.19 Bc ± 0.40 356.16 Db ± 0.52 1498.85 Ab ± 3.88 1541.74 Aa ± 7.97 1507.47 ABb ± 0.12 15,521.66 Cc ± 59.38 28,450.95 Aa ± 35.15 24,508.18 Bb± 184.62
Early White 397.30 Ba ± 1.84 264.68 BCc ± 0.04 369.43 BCb ± 1.27 1498.28 Aa ± 28.81 1509.07 Aa ± 3.47 1511.84 ABa ± 2.35 10,745.21 Ec ± 85.78 28,271.57 ABa ± 97.07 21,967.91 Db ± 92.47
Late Red 366.81 Eb ± 0.74 293.58 Ac ± 0.98 374.68 ABa ± 1.55 1520.51 Aa ± 8.54 1503.97 Aa ± 10.55 1540.98 Aa ± 13.76 24,393.48 Ab ± 141.37 28,040.22 Ba ± 116.32 22,852.36 Cc ± 34.32
Morado 392.25 Ba ± 1.27 261.98 Cc ± 1.25 372.28 ABCb ± 1.78 1526.70 Aab ± 2.22 1507.48 Ab ± 5.29 1540.91 Aa ± 11.34 15,137.52 Cc ± 19.02 27,959.12 Ba ± 137.14 25,418.22 Ab ± 78.64
New Zealand 407.62 Aa ± 2.77 262.18 Cc ± 1.82 377.23 Ab ± 0.43 976.98 Bb ± 103.18 1515.62 Aa ± 1.22 1513.12 ABa ± 1.96 6343.02 Fc ± 74.17 28,122.04 ABa ± 89.46 17,020.23 Gb± 60.65
Quinault 393.00 Ba ± 2.53 263.34 BCc ± 0.03 367.05 Cb ± 0.83 1510.69 Aa ± 47.79 1507.32 Aa ± 25.72 1529.75 Aa ± 9.86 14,145.80 Dc ± 73.92 28,231.91 ABa ± 40.48 18,959.50 Fb ± 50.17

Reported values are presented as mean values ± standard deviation. Mean values with the same capital letter in a column are not significantly different as indicated by Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Mean values with the same small letter in a row for each measured trait are not significantly different as indicated by Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).