Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 13;23(2):408. doi: 10.3390/molecules23020408

Table 2.

Optimization of reaction conditions of PhI and dibromothiophene by DHAP a.

Entry Pd Catalyst Base Ligand Mn b (kDa) PDI b Yield c (%)
1 Pd(PPh3)4 Cs2CO3 P(o-OMePh)3 7.8 3.89 27.6
2 Pd(OAc)2 Cs2CO3 P(o-OMePh)3 5.7 3.64 19.7
3 Pd2(dba)3 Cs2CO3 P(o-OMePh)3 11.0 2.09 49.6
4 Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 Cs2CO3 P(o-OMePh)3 8.9 2.47 22.2
5 Pd2(dba)3 K2CO3 P(o-OMePh)3 12.2 1.66 64.1
6 Pd2(dba)3 K2CO3 P(o-tol)3 10.1 1.92 52.4
7 Pd2(dba)3 K2CO3 PCy3·HBF4 8.6 3.49 26.1
8 Pd2(dba)3 KOAc P(o-OMePh)3 9.1 2.38 39.2

a DHAP was carried out in the presence of palladium catalyst (5 mol %), phosphine ligand (10 mol %), base (2.5 equiv.) and additive (30 mol %) at 110 °C for 72 h. b Determined by gel permertion chromatography (GPC) on polystyrene standards in dichlorobenzene (DCB). c The products were obtained by reprecipitation from methanol after Soxhlet extraction.