Skip to main content
. 2016 May 9;7(8):4973–4979. doi: 10.1039/c6sc01569g

Table 2. Comparison of selected experimental and calculated bonding parameters of 1H, 1Hcalc and 1H′calc.

Si1–Si2 [Å] Si1–C1 [Å] Si2–C2 [Å] Si1 c [°] C1–Si1–Si2–C2 [°] φ NHC1 d [°] φ NHC2 d [°]
1H 2.281(3) 1.873(4) 1.873(4) 180.0(3) 3.3(2) 3.3(2)
1Hcalc a 2.339 1.885 1.907 335.51 173.69 32.71 1.26
1Hcalc b 2.308 1.861 1.884 342.58 173.63 21.95 3.41
1H′calc b 2.289 1.841 1.886 359.61 179.32 6.68 3.24

aCalculated at the B3LYP/6-311G**/6-31G* level of theory.

bCalculated at the B97-D3/RI-JCOSX/def2-TZVP level of theory.

cSi1 is the sum of angles around the Si1 atom.

d φ NHC1 and φNHC2 denote the dihedral angles between the least-square plane of the atoms C1, Si1, Si2, C2 and the least square plane of the heterocyclic ring atoms of the NHC substituent bonded to Si1 and Si2, respectively.