Table 2. Comparison of selected experimental and calculated bonding parameters of 1H, 1Hcalc and 1H′calc.
| Si1–Si2 [Å] | Si1–C1 [Å] | Si2–C2 [Å] | ∑Si1 c [°] | C1–Si1–Si2–C2 [°] | φ NHC1 d [°] | φ NHC2 d [°] | |
| 1H | 2.281(3) | 1.873(4) | 1.873(4) | — | 180.0(3) | 3.3(2) | 3.3(2) |
| 1Hcalc a | 2.339 | 1.885 | 1.907 | 335.51 | 173.69 | 32.71 | 1.26 |
| 1Hcalc b | 2.308 | 1.861 | 1.884 | 342.58 | 173.63 | 21.95 | 3.41 |
| 1H′calc b | 2.289 | 1.841 | 1.886 | 359.61 | 179.32 | 6.68 | 3.24 |
aCalculated at the B3LYP/6-311G**/6-31G* level of theory.
bCalculated at the B97-D3/RI-JCOSX/def2-TZVP level of theory.
c∑Si1 is the sum of angles around the Si1 atom.
d φ NHC1 and φNHC2 denote the dihedral angles between the least-square plane of the atoms C1, Si1, Si2, C2 and the least square plane of the heterocyclic ring atoms of the NHC substituent bonded to Si1 and Si2, respectively.