Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 18;114(3):431–442. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvx245

Figure 2.

Figure 2

  Mitoprotection restored subsarcolemal mitochondrial density. (A) Representative transmission electron microscopy images of cross-sectioned cardiomyocytes showing distribution of mitochondria. (B) The number of subsarcolemal mitochondria (arrows) was lower in MetS compared to Lean, but increased in MetS + ELAM (n = 6/group). (C) Mitochondrial area and matrix density did not differ among the groups (n = 6/group). *P < 0.05 vs. lean, P < 0.05 vs. MetS + ELAM.