Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 27;73(4):655–665. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbw073

Table 2.

Multilevel Models Predicting Negative Marital Quality in Wave 2 as a Function of Drinking Status in Wave 1

Model 1 Model 2
b SE b SE
Intercept 1.928*** 0.015 1.932*** 0.015
Negative marital quality Wave 1 0.608*** 0.012 0.609*** 0.012
Gender (Wife) 0.022** 0.007 0.029*** 0.008
Education −0.001 0.003 −0.001 0.003
Length of marriage −0.001 0.001 −0.001 0.001
Race (White) −0.013 0.014 −0.013 0.014
Age 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
Actor drinking −0.008 0.008 −0.003 0.009
Partner drinking −0.011 0.008 −0.015 0.008
Actor drinking × Partner drinking −0.025** 0.009 −0.029** 0.009
Gender × Actor drinking 0.011 0.009
Gender × Partner drinking −0.004 0.009
Gender × Actor drinking × Partner drinking −0.016* 0.008
−2 Log likelihood 8,023.6 8,018.6
Proportion of between variance accounted for .70 .70
Proportion of within variance accounted for .23 .23
Change in likelihood 13.6** 18.6**

Notes: All models were adjusted for the weighted data. Changes in likelihood are based on comparison with a covariates-only model (−2 log likelihood = 8,037.2). Estimates are unstandardized. Variance accounted for is determined in comparison with the unrestricted model.

*p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.