Table 2.
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
b | SE | b | SE | |
Intercept | 1.928*** | 0.015 | 1.932*** | 0.015 |
Negative marital quality Wave 1 | 0.608*** | 0.012 | 0.609*** | 0.012 |
Gender (Wife) | 0.022** | 0.007 | 0.029*** | 0.008 |
Education | −0.001 | 0.003 | −0.001 | 0.003 |
Length of marriage | −0.001 | 0.001 | −0.001 | 0.001 |
Race (White) | −0.013 | 0.014 | −0.013 | 0.014 |
Age | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Actor drinking | −0.008 | 0.008 | −0.003 | 0.009 |
Partner drinking | −0.011 | 0.008 | −0.015 | 0.008 |
Actor drinking × Partner drinking | −0.025** | 0.009 | −0.029** | 0.009 |
Gender × Actor drinking | 0.011 | 0.009 | ||
Gender × Partner drinking | −0.004 | 0.009 | ||
Gender × Actor drinking × Partner drinking | −0.016* | 0.008 | ||
−2 Log likelihood | 8,023.6 | 8,018.6 | ||
Proportion of between variance accounted for | .70 | .70 | ||
Proportion of within variance accounted for | .23 | .23 | ||
Change in likelihood | 13.6** | 18.6** |
Notes: All models were adjusted for the weighted data. Changes in likelihood are based on comparison with a covariates-only model (−2 log likelihood = 8,037.2). Estimates are unstandardized. Variance accounted for is determined in comparison with the unrestricted model.
*p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.