Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 26;14(6):e8227. doi: 10.15252/msb.20188227

Figure EV1. Validation cell‐type‐enriched culturing methods, metabolome dynamics, and mitochondria abundance and bioenergetics in differentiating organoids.

Figure EV1

  1. GSEA of Lgr+ and Lgr intestinal cell signatures from Munoz et al (2012) for CV‐ and EN‐enriched proteins.
  2. Heatmap showing the relative abundances of significantly changing metabolites measured with mass spectrometry‐based lipidomics and metabolomics. Relative change in abundance is shown as the log2 fold change over the row mean. Different classes of metabolites are color‐coded. Significantly enriched Reactome pathways (P < 0.05) are shown next to the corresponding cluster of metabolites.
  3. Correlation heatmap of two independent proteomics datasets of cell‐type‐enriched organoids cultures. The different genetic background organoids lack the GFP reporter compared to the Lgr5‐GFP‐DTR organoids.
  4. Overview of basal ECAR (glycolysis) and OCR (mitochondrial respiration) rates during basal measurements. Plotted data represent mean and SD of 4 independent experiments. Bioenergetics analysis was performed by Seahorse technology (mitochondrial stress test).
  5. Mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) complexes were analyzed by Western blot. Values indicate the sum of all complexes normalized by vinculin as a loading control. Representative image of four independent experiments.
  6. Mitochondrial DNA copy number was assessed by quantitative PCR of mitochondrial‐encoded genes and a nuclear‐encoded gene using total DNA as template. Bars indicate the mean and error bars SEM of four independent experiments.
  7. Basal OCR/ECAR ratio. Plotted data represent mean and SD of four independent experiments. Bioenergetics analysis was performed by Seahorse technology (mitochondrial stress test). P‐value is calculated with an unpaired two‐sided Student's t‐test.