Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 26;13(6):e0199466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199466

Table 2. Antagonism of different endophytic strains against A. alternata.

Strains Taxonomic classification Sources Colony diameter of the pathogen (mm) Inhibition rate (%)
St-zn-3 Bacterium Stem 24.07 ± 0.26 29.48 eD
St-zn-4 Bacterium Flower 23.43 ± 0.12 31.35 deD
St-zn-5 Bacterium Stem 27.33 ± 0.22 19.92 gF
St-zn-9 Fungus Flower 7.20 ± 0.15 78.9 aA
St-zn-12 Actinomycete Stem 17.37 ± 0.12 49.11 bB
St-zn-15 Fungus Fruit 16.73 ± 0.12 50.98 bB
St-zn-21 Fungus Flower 8.47 ± 0.30 75.18 aA
St-zn-34 Bacterium Leaf 7.50 ± 0.06 78.03 aA
St-zn-35 Bacterium Leaf 8.33 ± 0.13 75.59 aA
St-zn-41 Actinomycete Fruit 25.93 ± 0.09 24.03 fE
St-zn-42 Actinomycete Leaf 23.17 ± 0.23 32.11 dD
St-zn-43 Bacterium Flower 27.27 ± 0.20 20.1 gF
St-zn-45 Bacterium Leaf 29.40 ± 0.36 13.86 hG
St-zn-46 Fungus Flower 19.67 ± 0.39 42.37 cC
CK 34.13 ± 0.09 0

Note: The data are the average of three replicates and presented as the means ± standard error. Different lowercase and capital letters in the same column indicated significant differences at 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively. CK: Control plates of A. alternata CN193 without endophytic strains.