Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr. 2018 Apr 4;198:201–208.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.02.032

Table 3.

online. Prevalence of potential mediators and univariate analyses for relationship with persistent wheezing illness

Potential mediator Total cohort (N=420) No persistent wheezing illness (N=231) Persistent wheezing illness (N=189) P-value
Potential ETS exposure 97 (24) 44 (20) 53 (28) 0.04
Child <5y in home 242 (62) 124 (58) 118 (66) 0.12
Eczema and/or hay fever 189 (45) 88 (38) 101 (53) 0.002
RSV 66 (15) 27 (12) 39 (21) 0.01
Parent history of asthma 70 (17) 31 (13) 39 (21) 0.05
Furry pet in home 171 (44) 97 (46) 74 (42) 0.46
Anticipated breast milk diet 187 (45) 118 (53) 69 (37) 0.001
Public insurance 243 (59) 114 (51) 129 (69) <0.001
BPD 279 (66) 139 (60) 140 (74) 0.003
Maternal education 0.03
 Less than high school 54 (13) 29 (12) 25 (13)
 High school graduate/some college 206 (49) 101 (44) 105 (56)
 College graduate/graduate school 160 (38) 101 (44) 59 (31)

Data reported as mean ± SD or N (%). P-value by chi square or t-test.

BPD – bronchopulmonary dysplasia; ETS – environmental tobacco smoke; RSV – respiratory syncytial virus