Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 27;38(3):BSR20180072. doi: 10.1042/BSR20180072

Table 4. The results of Begg’s and Egger’s tests for the publication bias.

Begg’s test Egger’s test
Comparison type Z-value P-value t-value P-value
DROSHA rs10719 (T > C)
Heterozygote compared with homozygote wild −2.250 0.024 −3.030 0.029
Homozygote variant compared with homozygote wild 0.450 0.652 0.300 0.774
Dominant model −1.950 0.051 −2.340 0.066
Recessive model 0.560 0.573 1.100 0.332
Allelic model −0.750 0.453 −1.330 0.241
DROSHA rs6877842 (G > C)
Heterozygote compared with homozygote wild −0.490 0.624 0.620 0.581
Homozygote variant compared with homozygote wild 0.000 1.000 0.020 0.988
Dominant model 0.000 1.000 0.500 0.650
Recessive model 0.000 1.000 0.030 0.976
Allelic model 0.000 1.000 0.740 0.511
DROSHA rs642321 (C > T)
Heterozygote compared with homozygote wild −1.000 0.317 NA NA
Homozygote variant compared with homozygote wild −1.000 0.317 NA NA
Dominant model −1.000 0.317 NA NA
Recessive model −1.000 0.317 NA NA
Allelic model −1.000 0.317 NA NA
DROSHA rs2291109 (A > T)
Heterozygote compared with homozygote wild −1.570 0.117 −1.270 0.426
Homozygote variant compared with homozygote wild 0.520 0.602 0.560 0.673
Dominant model −0.520 0.602 −0.830 0.558
Recessive model 0.520 0.602 0.870 0.545
Allelic model −0.520 0.602 −0.430 0.741
DGCR8 rs3757 (G > A)
Heterozygote compared with homozygote wild 1.000 0.317 NA NA
Homozygote variant compared with homozygote wild 1.000 0.317 NA NA
Dominant model 1.000 0.317 NA NA
Recessive model 1.000 0.317 NA NA
Allelic model 1.000 0.317 NA NA
DGCR8 rs417309 (G > A)
Heterozygote compared with homozygote wild −0.940 0.348 −2.150 0.098
Homozygote variant compared with homozygote wild 0.680 0.497 1.460 0.282
Dominant model −1.320 0.188 −1.460 0.219
Recessive model 0.680 0.497 1.710 0.230
Allelic model −0.190 0.851 −1.320 0.258
DGCR8 rs1640299 (T > G)
Heterozygote compared with homozygote wild −0.680 0.497 −0.540 0.644
Homozygote variant compared with homozygote wild 0.000 1.000 −0.560 0.635
Dominant model −0.680 0.497 −0.560 0.634
Recessive model 0.000 1.000 −0.070 0.949
Allelic model −0.680 0.497 −0.880 0.471

The results are in bold if P<0.1. Abbreviation: NA, not available.