Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 5;11(4):451–462. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0302-z

Table 4.

Participants’ assessment of two key topics [patient-centered outcomes research/comparative effectiveness research (PCOR/CER) and genetics]: phase I

Survey topics Baseline (Qa) Summative (Qb) n
Questions Mean (SD) Questions Mean (SD)
CER/PCOR Q1a. I am familiar with PCOR and CER Q1b. How much has your knowledge about PCOR and CER changed?
Group 1* 5.6 (1.9) 7.9 (1.1) 16  
Group 2** 9.4 (0.9) 6.8 (2.1) 17
Genetics
Q2a. I find it important to incorporate genetic information into CER 8.1 (2.1) Q2b. How much has your opinion on “the importance of incorporating genetic information into outcomes research” changed? 8.4 (1.7) 29
Q3a. I have a clear understanding of how genetic information may be incorporated in CER 6.1 (1.8) Q3b. How much has your understanding of “how genetic information may be incorporated in PCOR and CER” changed? 8.2 (1.2) 29
Q4a. I am interested in using genetic information in CER studies 8.2 (1.6) Q4b. How much has your interest in using genetic information in PCOR and CER studies changed? 8.2 (1.7) 29

n number of responses, SD standard deviation

*Limited experience with PCOR/CER prior to participation in phase I

**High level of experience with PCOR/CER prior to participation in phase I