Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 25;19:494. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4859-7

Table 3.

Robustness of the proposed correction

True correlation Plug-in correlation TP FP FDP
0.4 0.3 261.16 (260.27, 262.85) 2.42 (2.12, 2.71) 0.0091 (0.0080, 0.0102)
0.4 0.35 252.20 (250.92, 253.48) 1.56 (1.32, 1.80) 0.0061 (0.0052, 0.0070)
0.4 0.375 247.78 (246.79, 249.06) 1.48 (1.22, 1.73) 0.0059 (0.0049, 0.0069)
0.4 0.4 243.59 (242.31, 244.879) 1.40 (1.17, 1.63) 0.0057 (0.0048, 0.0066)
0.4 0.425 238.72 (237.42, 240.02) 1.60 (1.38, 1.82) 0.0066 (0.0057, 0.0075)
0.4 0.45 235.11 (233.88, 236.34) 1.96 (1.72, 2.20) 0.0082 (0.0072, 0.0092)
0.4 0.5 234.81 (233.57, 236.04) 1.96 (1.72, 2.20) 0.0082 (0.0072, 0.0092)

For the “positive pleiotropy A” scenario the correlation due to overlap is 0.4. Here we varied the correlation value in the de-correlation step from 0.3 to 0.5. TP, true positives; FP false positives, FDP, false discovery proportion