Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Parasitology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Parasitology
. 2018 Jan-Mar;13(1):100–107.

Additional Glance on the Role of Dientamoeba fragilis & Blastocystis hominis in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Ayman Nabil IBRAHIM 1,*, Ayman Mohamed AL-ASHKAR 1, John Talaat NAZEER 1
PMCID: PMC6019581  PMID: 29963091

Abstract

Background:

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disease with high population prevalence. Dientamoeba fragilis and Blastocystis hominis are reported worldwide as a cause of human gastrointestinal symptoms. This study evaluated the possible link between this syndrome and the infection with D. fragilis and B. hominis in Egypt.

Methods:

Overall, 310 stool samples (160 from IBS patients and 150 from controls) were obtained from Tropical Medicine Outpatient Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt between Mar 2015 and Feb 2016. All the stool specimens underwent direct examination and Trichrome staining. Each sample was cultivated on Jones and Robinson's media.

Results:

Overall, 42 cases (28%) showed B. hominis and 2 cases (1.3%) for D. fragilis infections. After performing the culture methods for B. hominis and D. fragilis, detections increased to 50 cases (33.3%) and 3 cases (2%), respectively. While among 150 controls 18 (12%) positive samples were detected as B. hominis.

Conclusion:

There may be a possible relationship between the presentation of irritable bowel syndrome and D. fragilis and B. hominis infections, which have to be excluded first.

Keywords: Dientamoeba fragilis, Blastocystis hominis, Irritable bowel syndrome

Introduction

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disease manifested by nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea usually is described as small volumes of loose stool preceded by urgency, frequent defecation, diffuse abdominal pain, distention, and alternation in bowel habits in absence of a specific organic pathology. Several global studies recorded the prevalence of IBS to fall between 10%–20% (1). Diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome relies on the exclusion of other infections or bowel diseases; however, the most important diagnostic factor is the fulfillment of ROME III criteria (2). The therapeutic treatment targets the relief of symptoms with addition of psychotherapy (3).

Dientamoeba fragilis is a human intestinal protozoan parasite, commonly reported worldwide and associated with gastrointestinal manifestations (4). Firstly, mistaken by Jepps and Dobell who classified it as an amoeba (5). Then it is a trichomonad without flagella by molecular studies and electron microscopy (6). Dientamoeba remains neglected despite many reports of its pathogenic potential. This is due to the lack of studies on Dientamoeba compared to other intestinal protozoa such as Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia lamblia. Therefore, to say that D. fragilis is the exact cause of gastrointestinal disturbance, there must be no other pathogen detected (7).

Blastocystis hominis is a cosmopolitan human intestinal protozoan parasite (8). It is an anaerobic intestinal parasite of humans and animals. Moreover, B. hominis is the most common parasite found in human stool samples (9). Its prevalence rates are variable among countries (10). Prevalence is higher in developing (11, 12) than industrialized (13, 14) countries due to poor personal hygiene and consumption of contaminated food and water (15). The pathogenic ability of Blastocystis was widely discussed in different studies to determine whether this parasite was pathogenic or not (16). However, in-vitro and in-vivo studies showed that Blastocystis infection might be associated with gastrointestinal symptoms especially in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (17). The most common symptoms associated with Blastocystis infection include abdominal pain, diarrhea, and vomiting. There are many reports of patients that showed no other cause of gastrointestinal symptoms other than Blastocystis (18). Several studies associated Blastocystis with cutaneous manifestations in addition to gastrointestinal symptoms (19).

In Egypt, the two protozoa are prevalent. Prevalence rates ranging from 1% to 30% were recorded for D. fragilis (2023). Rates varying between 1% and 35% were recorded for B. hominis (2428). B. hominis was most frequently found in patients with D. fragilis (2629) especially in irritable bowel syndrome patients.

The methods commonly used to diagnose parasitic infections have a poor yield due to lack of experience in stool examination under microscopy, so staining methods and specific techniques such as cultures are needed to improve performance (29).

Newer molecular techniques, real-time PCR (qPCR) with multiplexing targeting the small-subunit (SSU) ribosomal DNA (rDNA), have been developed and very attractive to be used (30). “The implementation of multiplex assays had a tremendous impact on routine parasitology laboratory studies in the developed world. However, the cost of such real-time PCR, assay in developing countries at present would prevent their application to routine diagnosis” (31).

The aim of this work was to evaluate for the first time in Egypt the possible link between patients with irritable bowel syndrome and the infection with D. fragilis and B. hominis.

Materials and Methods

This descriptive case-control study in which 310 stool samples were obtained from Tropical Medicine Outpatient Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt between Mar 2015 and Feb 2016. The patients were fulfilling ROME III criteria of IBS (160) and the other 150 were controls. The controls were composed of healthy volunteers. The age of the participants ranged between 16–50 yr from both sexes.

These patients underwent thorough history and physical examination. All the stool specimens were processed by fresh direct film microscopy and another examination after staining. Stool culture was done for B. hominis and D. fragilis.

Microscopy of fecal smear

Fecal sample microscopy was done as described before (32, 33); Specimens were fixed in both; Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and 10% formalin (34) then stained with Ghomori`s Trichrome stain (32) and modified Ziehl Neelsen stain to exclude coccidian infections (35). These preparations were examined under the low power (×10), the high power (×40) and the oil immersion (×100) objectives.

Culture

For culturing B. hominis, Jones medium without starch was used (36). The cultures were incubated at 37 °C and examined after 48 h. If no B. hominis were seen up to further 2 d, they were regarded as negative. The sediment was examined under both the low power (×10) and high dry (×40) objectives. Robinson's medium was used to culture D. fragilis according to Windsor et al (37).

Statistical Analysis

The collected data was revised, coded, tabulated and introduced to a PC using SPSS. Data were analyzed using SPSS package ver. 15 (Inc., Chicago, IL). Chi-square test (Fisher’s exact test) was used to examine the relation between qualitative variables. For quantitative data, comparison between two groups was done using Mann-Whitney test (nonparametric t-test).

Ethical consideration

An informed consent was taken from all patients before taking stool samples. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University.

Results

From the 150 patients presenting with IBS according to ROME III classification, 42 cases (28%) showed B. hominis (Fig. 1), 21 cases (14%) showed Entamoeba coli and 2 cases (1.3%) for each D. fragilis and Chilomastix mesnili infections. These results were shown after performing Trichrome staining technique. A note was made of the presence of other parasites such as Giardia intestinalis and Cryptosporidium spp., and these patients, ten in number, were excluded. No results revealed Enterobius vermicularis infection.

Fig. 1:

Fig. 1:

Trichrome stained film (×1000) showing B. hominis cyst with rounded vacuolated structure and peripheral nuclei

However, after performing the culture methods for B. hominis and D. fragilis detections increased to 50 cases (33.3%) and 3 cases (2%), respectively (Table 1).

Table 1:

Detection by various tests for B. hominis and D. fragilis in IBS patients

Saline/Iodine No (%) Trichrome No (%) Culture No (%)
Blastocystis hominis
Positive 42 (28) 42 (28) 50 (33.3)
Negative 108 (72) 108 (72) 100 (66.7)
Dientamoeba fragilis
Positive 0 (0) 2 (1.3) 3 (2)
Negative 150 (100) 148 (98.7) 147 (98)

Comparison between cases and controls regarding B. hominis and D. fragilis as detected by microscopy and culture methods among cases and controls exhibited high significance in B. hominis cases (P=0.0001) and non-significant value (P=0.08) as regards D. fragilis cases. Moreover, the detected positive samples for B. hominis and D. fragilis among the 150 controls are 18 (12%) and zero (0%) respectively (Table 2).

Table 2:

Comparison between cases and controls regarding B. hominis and D. fragilis as detected by Microscopy and culture methods

IBS (mic/cul) Controls (mic/cul) P-value
Blastocystis hominis 0.0001
Positive 50 18
Negative 100 132
Dientamoeba fragilis 0.08
Positive 3 0
Negative 147 150
*

Significant: P ≤ 0.05.

**

Highly significant: P ≤ 0.001.

Distribution of B. hominis and D. fragilis positive cases among their age groups was shown in Table 3 and Fig. 2. B. hominis positive cases were 8 (16%) under age of 20 yr, 21 (42%) from 20 to 30, 12 (24%) from 31 to 40 and 9 (18%) from 40 to 50 yr old. While for the D. fragilis positive cases, 2 (66.7%) cases were recorded from 20 to 30 aged group and only one case from 30 to 40 yr old. This may give a correlation of the most affected age group by both parasites which is the 20–30 age groups.

Table 3:

Distribution of B. hominis and D. fragilis positive cases among their age groups

Age(yr) Blastocystis (50) Dientamoeba (3)
N % N %
<20 8 16 0 0
20–30 21 42 2 66.7
31–40 12 24 1 33.3
41–50 9 18 0 0

Fig. 2:

Fig. 2:

Distribution of B. hominis and D. fragilis positive cases among their age groups

Discussion

There is a possible relationship between IBS and B. hominis and D. fragilis infections especially B. hominis infection (33.3%).

This coincides was investigated the prevalence of Dientamoeba and Blastocystis in irritable bowel syndrome patients (IBS) in Turkey (38). They did not find any stool sample positive for Dientamoeba but reported that many patients with IBS were found to have five or more Blastocystis parasites per field than control groups and they also reported regression of IBS symptoms after treatment in most of the patients with Blastocystis and lastly concluded that there may be a possible link between IBS and Blastocystis.

Moreover, Dientamoeba in 7.6% of fecal specimens from patients with enteritis was detected (39) and Dientamoeba in 0.9% of patients with diarrhea not detected in a control group of 900 patients without bowel complaints (40). Other study detected Dientamoeba in 4.5% of patients suffering from non-specific bowel disorders and 2% of patients with diarrhea (41). Dientamoeba was detected in 5.4% of patients with bowel complaints using light microscopy in combination with culture, PCR and real-time PCR (23).

Moreover, a study that aimed to screen for Blastocystis in colonic stool aspirate samples in patients with and without IBS undergoing colonoscopy and measured the interleukin levels (IL-3, IL-5, and IL-8) (42). They used stool cultures, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection and subtyping of Blastocystis. Patients with IBS infected with only Blastocystis showed an increase in the interleukin levels which suggested that Blastocystis does have an effect on the immune system of the patient.

As an opposite opinion, a study was utilized a population-based sampling frame and Rome criteria assessment to examine the phenomenon of IBS in a “non-sterile” developing population, where repeated exposure to gastrointestinal pathogens is common and found B. hominis infection to be more in controls than IBS patients and stated a lack of an association between IBS and parasite infection in the developing nation environment of Nicaragua, Central America (43).

Although molecular methods specially Real-time PCR (qPCR) considered as an attractive technique for laboratory diagnosis of infectious diseases and would give more accurate results with D. fragilis (44), this could not be applied in the study due to high expenses and being not a routine method in developing countries.

Consequently, culture method was used as additional and confirmatory technique with the direct and staining as its effectiveness was proved over microscopy (29, 36) and in sometime over the PCR (29).

Conclusion

There may be a possible relationship between Irritable Bowel Syndrome and D. fragilis and B. hominis infections, especially B. hominis infection.

Footnotes

Financial support

There has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Bercik P, Verdu EF, Collins SM. Is irritable bowel syndrome a low-grade inflammatory bowel disease? Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2005;34(2):235–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Drossman DA. Rome III: The new criteria. Chin J Dig Dis. 2006;7(4):181–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Enck P, Aziz Q, Barbara G, et al. Irritable bowel syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016; 2:16014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stark D, Barratt J, Chan D, Ellis JT. Dientamoeba fragilis, the Neglected Trichomonad of the Human Bowel. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016;29(3):553–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jepps MW, Dobell C. Dientamoeba fragilis n.g., n. sp.: a new intestinal amoeba from man. Parasitology. 1918; 10:352–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gerbod D, Edgcomb VP, Noël C, Zenner L, Wintjens R, Delgado-Viscogliosi P, Holder ME, Sogin ML, Viscogliosi E. Phylogenetic position of the trichomonad parasite of turkeys, Histomonas meleagridis (Smith) Tyzzer, inferred from small subunit rRNA sequence. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2001;48(4):498–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Barratt JL, Harkness J, Marriott D, Ellis JT, Stark D. A review of Dientamoeba fragilis carriage in humans: Several reasons why this organism should be considered in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal illness. Gut Microbes. 2011;2(1):3–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Azizian M, Basati G, Abangah G, Mahmoudi MR, Mirzaei A. Contribution of Blastocystis hominis subtypes and associated inflammatory factors in development of irritable bowel syndrome. Parasitol Res. 2016;115(5):2003–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tan KS. New insights on classification, identification, and clinical relevance of Blastocystis spp. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21(4):639–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Alfellani MA, Stensvold CR, Vidal-Lapiedra A, Onuoha ES, Fagbenro-Beyioku AF, Clark CG. Variable geographic distribution of Blastocystis subtypes and its potential implications. Acta Trop. 2013; 126(1):11–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Aguiar JI, Gonçalves AQ, Sodré FC, Pereira Sdos R, Bóia MN, de Lemos ER, Daher RR. Intestinal protozoa and helminthes among Terena Indians in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul: high prevalence of Blastocystis hominis. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2007; 40(6):631–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pegelow K, Gross R, Pietrzik K, Lukito W, Richards AL, Fryauff DJ. Parasitological and nutritional situation of school children in the Sukaraja district, West Java, Indonesia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1997;28(1):173–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hirata T, Nakamura H, Kinjo N, Hokama A, Kinjo F, Yamane N, Fujita J. Prevalence of Blastocystis hominis and Strongyloides stercoralis infection in Okinawa, Japan. Parasitol Res. 2007;101(6):1717–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wong KH, Ng GC, Lin RT, Yoshikawa H, Taylor MB, Tan KS. Predominance of subtype 3 among Blastocystis isolates from a major hospital in Singapore. Parasitol Res. 2008; 102(4):663–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nagel R, Cuttell L, Stensvold CR, Mills PC, Bielefeldt-Ohmann H, Traub RJ. Blastocystis subtypes in symptomatic and asymptomatic family members and pets and response to therapy. Intern Med J. 2012;42(11):1187–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tan KS, Mirza H, Teo JD, Wu B, Macary PA. Current views on the clinical relevance of Blastocystis spp. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2010; 12(1):28–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Souppart L, Sanciu G, Cian A, et al. Molecular epidemiology of human Blastocystis isolates in France. Parasitol Res. 2009;105(2):413–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Roberts T, Stark D, Harkness J, Ellis J. Update on the pathogenic potential and treatment options for Blastocystis sp. Gut Pathog. 2014; 6:17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Verma R, Delfanian K. Blastocystis hominis associated acute urticaria. Am J Med Sci. 2013;346(1):80–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.El Shazly AM, Awad SE, Sultan DM, Sadek GS, Khalil HH, Morsy TA. Intestinal parasites in Dakahlia governorate, with different techniques in diagnosing protozoa. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2006;36(3):1023–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rayan HZ, Ismail OA, El Gayar EK. Prevalence and clinical features of Dientamoeba fragilis infections in patients suspected to have intestinal parasitic infection. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2007;37(2):599–608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Elnadi NA, Hassanien HA, Ahmad AM, Abd Ellah AK. Intestinal parasites in diabetic patients in Sohag university hospitals, Egypt. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2015;45(2):443–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Stark D, Barratt J, Roberts T, Marriott D, Harkness J, Ellis J. A review of the clinical presentation of dientamoebiasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;82(4):614–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shehata AI, Hassanein F. Intestinal parasitic infections among mentally handicapped individuals in Alexandria, Egypt. Ann Parasitol. 2015;61(4):275–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Eassa SM, El-Wahab EW, Lotfi SE, El Masry SA, Shatat HZ, Kotkat AM. Risk Factors Associated with Parasitic Infection Among Municipality Solid-Waste Workers in an Egyptian Community. J Parasitol. 2016;102(2):214–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Norberg A, Nord CE, Evengård B. Dientamoeba fragilis a protozoal infection which may cause severe bowel distress. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003; 9(1):65–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ozçakir O, Güreser S, Ergüven S, Yilmaz YA, Topaloğlu R, Hasçelik G. Characteristics of Blastocystis hominis infection in a Turkish university hospital. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2007;31(4):277–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stensvold CR, Alfellani MA, Nørskov-Lauritsen S, Prip K, Victory EL, Maddox C, Nielsen HV, Clark CG. Subtype distribution of Blastocystis isolates from synanthropic and zoo animals and identification of a new subtype. Int J Parasitol. 2009;39(4):473–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yakoob J, Jafri W, Beg MA, Abbas Z, Naz S, Islam M, Khan R. Blastocystis hominis and Dientamoeba fragilis in patients fulfilling irritable bowel syndrome criteria. Parasitol Res. 2010;107(3):679–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nazeer JT, El Sayed Khalifa K, von Thien H, El-Sibaei MM, Abdel-Hamid MY, Tawfik RA, Tannich E. Use of multiplex real-time PCR for detection of common diarrhea causing protozoan parasites in Egypt. Parasitol Res. 2013:112(2):595–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Haque R, Roy S, Siddique A, Mondal U, Rahman SM, Mondal D, Houpt E, Petri WA Jr. Multiplex real-time PCR assay for detection of Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia intestinalis, and Cryptosporidium spp. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007; 76(4):713–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.WHO Techniques of collection, preparation, and examination of samples, fecal specimens. In (Basic laboratory methods in medical parasitology, Parasitology-laboratory manuals). WHO; 1991. Geneva, Typest in India, Printed in England. P: 10–23; 1991a. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.WHO Reagents and solutions and their preparation in (Basic laboratory methods in medical parasitology, Parasitology laboratory manuals”. WHO; 1991. Geneva, Typest in India, Printed in England. P:100–105; 1991b. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Garcia LS. Collection, Preservation and Shipment of fecal specimens in (Diagnostic medical parasitology). Fifth edition (Garcia L. S. ed). ASM (American Society for microbiology) Press; P: 768–772; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Henriksen SA, Pohlenz JF. Staining of Cryptosporidium by a modified Ziehl-Neelsen technique. Acta Vet Scand. 1981; 22(3–4):594–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zman V, Khan KZ. A comparison of direct microscopy with culture for the diagnosis of Blastocystis hominis. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1994;25(4):792–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Windsor JJ, Macfarlane L, Hughes-Thapa G, Jones SK, Whiteside TM. Detection of Dientamoeba fragilis by culture. Br J Biomed Sci. 2003; 60(2):79–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mumcuoğlu I, Coşkun FA, Aksu N, Pürnak T, Güngör C. Role of Dientamoeba fragilis and Blastocystis spp. in Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2013; 37(2):73–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Crotti D, D’Annibale ML. Dientamoeba fragilis and dientamoebiasis: aspects of clinical parasitology and laboratory diagnosis. Parassitologia. 2001; 43(3):135–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Stark D, Beebe N, Marriott D, Ellis J, Harkness J. Prospective study of the prevalence, genotyping and clinical relevance of Dientamoeba fragilis infections in an Australian population. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(6):2718–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Crotti D, D’Annibale ML. Intestinal infections caused by Dientamoeba fragilis and Giardia duodenalis in our experience. Recenti Prog Med. 2007:98(6):361–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ragavan ND, Kumar S, Chye TT, Mahadeva S, Shiaw-Hooi H. Blastocystis sp. in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-Detection in Stool Aspirates during Colonoscopy. PLoS One. 2015; 10(9):e0121173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Morgan DR, Benshoff M, Cáceres M, Becker-Dreps S, Cortes L, Martin CF, Schmulson M, Peña R. Irritable bowel syndrome and gastrointestinal parasite infection in a developing nation environment. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012:2012:343812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Stark D, Beebe N, Marriott D, Ellis J, Harkness J. Evaluation of three diagnostic methods, including real-time PCR, for detection of Dientamoeba fragilis in stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(1):232–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES