Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Dec 26;47(6):1825–1837. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-1057-7

Table 2.

Counts and percentages of codes and subcodes.

Code Subcode Count Percentage
Quality of parent-adolescent relationships (N = 50)
Good (including okay) 25 50 %
Bad 15 30 %
Different with one parent versus another 10 20 %
Impact of sexual orientation on parent-adolescent relationships (N = 39)
Positive impact 4 10 %
Negative impact 22 56 %
No impact 10 26 %
Different with one parent versus another 3 8 %
Impact of sexual orientation on parent-adolescent discussions about sex and dating (N = 45)
Did impact frequency and/or quality 34 76 %
Did not impact frequency and/or quality 11 24 %
Parental monitoring (N = 31)
Parents do monitor 16 52 %
Parents do not monitor 15 48 %

Note. The sample included 52 individuals, but percentages are based on how many participants provided data relevant to each code; for “impact of sexual orientation…” codes, some participants described how being openly gay/bisexual impacted these domains, whereas others described how not being out to their parents impacted these domains; for “parental monitoring,” 15 participants indicated that their parents do not monitor them, but 7 of them went on to provide evidence of monitoring.