Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 26;13(6):e0198912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198912

Table 3. Employment of HIV-negative working-age adults who have HIV-positive household members compared to HIV-negative adults living in households with no infected household members.

Any work
last week
Any farm work
last week
ME [95% CI] ME [95% CI]
HIV-, no HIV+ household member Ref. Ref.
HIV-, lives with HIV+ CD4 >500 -1.78 [-5.16, 1.59] -0.84 [-4.56, 2.88]
HIV-, lives with HIV+ CD4 351–500 -7.03** [-11.49, -2.57] -7.00** [-11.79, -2.21]
HIV-, lives with HIV+ CD4 ≤350 -6.28** [-10.76, -1.80] -4.89* [-9.74, -0.03]
No household member on ART Ref. Ref.
All HIV+ household members on ART 0.35 [-3.47, 4.17] 0.00 [-4.35, 4.36]
Some HIV+ household members on ART 2.60 [-5.97, 11.17] 1.76 [-8.56, 12.08]
Mean outcome for reference group 70.9 58.7
No. observations 7,874 7,874
P-values from post-estimation Wald tests 
HIV-, CD4 >500 = HIV-, CD4 351–500 0.029 0.019
HIV-, CD4 >500 = HIV-, CD4 ≤350 0.056 0.117

Abbreviations: ME, marginal effect; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval, HIV+, HIV-positive; HIV-, HIV-negative; ART, antiretroviral therapy.Notes: GEE regression models for working age adults (18–65 years old), with binomial distribution, logistic link, and exchangeable correlation at the household level. Marginal effects are reported as percentage point changes. Reference group are HIV-negative participants who do not reside with HIV-positive household members. Models controlled for education level, age, age-squared, gender, marital status, wealth index, number of children in household, number of household members, and community indicators. P-value notation

*** p<0.001

** p<0.01

* p<0.05