Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 26;13(6):e0199526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199526

Table 4. Average effect of CFP on eH’ and sensitivity analysis by forest category.

(1) Forest Category (2) No. of Plots in CFP/ non-CFP (3) Average SMD of Observed confounders (before/
after match)
ATTB (Comparison of Medians) Hidden bias
(4) Point estimate (5) Lower confidence limit-95% (6) Upper confidence limit-95% (7) p-value (8) Critical level of bias (Γ)
Overall forest 325/70 0.40/0.11 0.65 0.31 1.00 0.000 1.24
Lower altitude 170/60 0.37/0.21 0.38 -0. 14 0.90 0.151
Higher altitude 155/28 0.24/0.08 -0.51 -0.98 -0.04 0.031 1
Lower slope 89/28 0.39/0.11 0.60 0.08 1.14 0.024 1.18
Higher slope 236/56 0.26/0.17 0.67 0.27 1.07 0.001 1.36
Terai 120/43 0.36/0.13 0.73 0.20 1.22 0.008 1.26
Hill 205/41 0.16/0.10 -0.29 -0.71 0.17 0.201
Open canopy 149/41 0.42/0.09 0.88 0.39 1.36 0.001 1.45
Closed canopy 176/53 0.39/0.13 0.33 -0.04 0.07 0.072

Columns 2 and 3 provide the number of CFP/non-CFP forest plots and average SMD of confounders before and after matches. Columns 4, 5, 6 and 7 present the ATTB, lower and upper confidence levels of ATTB and p-values. Columns 8 provide information about the sensitivities of estimated results to unobserved confounders and the p-values.