Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 22;15(Suppl 1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0530-7

Table 3.

Relative risk with 95% confidence intervals for the binomial and lognormal approaches, and gain in precision, Althabe et al. trial [1]

Approach RR (95% CI) CCT vs Hands-off Ratio upper/lower limit of the 95% CI Log scale width ratio lognormal vs binomial (%)
Binomial 0.58 (0.14 to 2.37) 16.9
Lognormal 0.86 (0.22 to 2.62) 11.9 70.4