Table 3.
Relative risk with 95% confidence intervals for the binomial and lognormal approaches, and gain in precision, Althabe et al. trial [1]
Approach | RR (95% CI) CCT vs Hands-off | Ratio upper/lower limit of the 95% CI | Log scale width ratio lognormal vs binomial (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Binomial | 0.58 (0.14 to 2.37) | 16.9 | – |
Lognormal | 0.86 (0.22 to 2.62) | 11.9 | 70.4 |