Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Ther. 2017 Dec 12;49(4):525–537. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2017.11.012

Table 2.

Results from ordered logistic regressions for the effect of types of strategies on self report fidelity to MBC

DV: MAU1 MAU2 MAU3

Coef. Std.
Err.
Coef. Std.
Err.
Coef. Std.
Err.
Plan −3.496 4.451 −4.602 4.459 −3.882 4.752
Educate 1.485 3.873 5.429 3.752 −0.157 3.696
Finance 11.224** 4.753 12.893** 4.429 7.021 4.379
Restructure −1.207 2.032 −3.211 2.034 0.874 1.842
QM −0.595 1.066 −1.034 0.995 0.531 0.958
Base line score
2 0.31 0.578 0.616 0.543 0.535 0.574
3 1.274 0.939 1.561* 0.904 1.11 0.869
4 0.497 0.846 0.59 0.756 0.094 0.76
/cut1 −4.749 2.645 −5.438 2.734 −1.311 2.397
/cut2 −3.379 2.609 −4.09 2.711 −0.629 2.379
/cut3 −2.03 2.585 −2.3 2.687 1.147 2.388

Note: Reference category for baseline score is a value of 1. The MAU has three indicator items: MAU1-administration of standardized progress measures, MAU2-review of client symptom score trajectory, MAU3-discusion of scores with clients; QM-Quality Management Category,

*

p < 0.1,

**

p < 0.05