Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 1;197(7):933–943. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201704-0704OC

Table 2.

Cognitive Characteristics of NYU Cohort at Baseline and Follow-up Evaluations

  All (n = 108) Normal (n = 50) Mild OSA (n = 43) Moderate–Severe OSA (n = 15)
MMSE baseline 29.31 ± 0.99 29.40 ± 0.93 29.18 ± 0.98 29.33 ± 1.30
MMSE follow-up 29.36 ± 0.85 29.51 ± 0.718 29.29 ± 0.867 29.00 ± 1.206
CDR baseline 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0
CDR follow-up 0.010 ± 0.071 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0.083 ± 0.19
Animal fluency (z-scores) 0.207 ± 0.99 0.24 ± 1.14 0.05 ± 0.81 0.50 ± 0.95
Animal fluency (Δ z-scores) −0.23 ± 0.87 −0.30 ± 0.98 −0.20 ± 0.85 −0.11 ± 0.54
Vegetable fluency (z-scores) −0.042 ± 1.1 −0.023 ± 0.98 −0.14 ± 1.28 0.15 ± 0.96
Vegetable fluency (Δ z-scores) −0.14 ± 0.99 −0.39 ± 0.87 0.087 ± 1.08 −0.02 ± 0.98
Boston Naming Test (z-scores) −0.20 ± 1.03 −0.10 ± 1.06 −0.38 ± 0.98 −0.017 ± 1.07
Boston Naming Test (Δ z-scores) 0.11 ± 0.71 0.24 ± 0.69 0.12 ± 0.71 −0.28 ± 0.69
Logic 1 (z-scores) 0.19 ± 0.96 0.11 ± 1.0 0.24 ± 0.90 0.29 ± 1.05
Logic 1 (Δ z-scores) −0.007 ± 0.86 −0.03 ± 0.87 −0.07 ± 0.82 0.23 ± 0.96
Logic 2 (z-scores) 0.10 ± 1.0 0.11 ± 1.07 0.008 ± 0.97 0.33 ± 0.88
Logic 2 (Δ z-scores) −0.012 ± 0.75 0.042 ± 0.8 −0.06 ± 0.75 −0.04 ± 0.67
Trails Making Test-A time (z-scores) 0.062 ± 1.06 −0.14 ± 0.88 −0.33 ± 1.04 0.12 ± 0.89
Trails Making Test-A time (Δ z-scores) 0.048 ± 0.88 0.025 ± 0.14 0.127 ± 0.7 −0.093 ± 1.03
Trails Making Test-B time (z-scores) −0.17 ± 0.96 −0.14 ± 0.89 −0.33 ± 1.04 0.12 ± 0.9
Trails Making Test-B time (Δ z-scores) −0.034 ± 0.72 −0.007 ± 0.65 −0.002 ± 0.63 −0.19 ± 0.64
DSST (z-scores) 0.2 ± 0.95 0.2 ± 0.83 0.14 ± 1.03 0.36 ± 1.11
DSST (Δ z-scores) 0.07 ± 0.44 0.1 ± 0.44 −0.003 ± 0.45 0.18 ± 0.37

Definition of abbreviations: CDR = Clinical Dementia Rating; DSST = Digit Symbol Substitution Test; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Exam; NYU = New York University; OSA = obstructive sleep apnea.

Data are shown as mean ± SD.

Lower z-scores represent worse cognitive function.