Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 12;2018:6120925. doi: 10.1155/2018/6120925

Table 1.

Details of different groups imaged at the various sites (Germany, USA, Denmark, and Belgium; see text for details).

PET imaging site Experimental group Control group
Site number 1, Germany (Technical University of Munich) HAEO (n = 11) HAECGER (n = 11)

Site number 2, USA (University of California, Irvine) Sev0.25% (n = 8) HAECsev (n = 8)
Sev0.5% (n = 8)
Des1% (n = 7) HAECdes (n = 7)

Site number 3, Denmark (Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital) CB (n = 7) HAECDEN (n = 7)

Site number 4, Belgium (University Hospital of Liege) UWS (n = 65) HAECBEL (n = 28)
MCS (n = 65)
EMCS (n = 17)

∗ indicates that both absolute CMRglc (aCMRglc) and quantified CMRglc (qCMRglc) were obtained from the USA site, enabling comparison between them (see Figures 1(b) and 1(c)). aCMRglc: absolute CMRglc with blood sampling of the tracer FDG supply to the brain; qCMRglc: calibration of quantified comparing qCMRglc with aCMRglc for HAEC only eqs. (1 and 2); HAEC: healthy people awake with eyes closed (control condition); HAEO: healthy people awake with eyes open; Des1%: healthy people sedated with 1% desflurane; Sev0.25%: healthy people sedated with 0.25% sevoflurane; Sev0.50%: healthy people sedated with 0.5% sevoflurane; CB: awake people with congenital blindness; UWS: patients who were unresponsive wakefulness syndrome; MCS: patients who were in a minimally conscious state; EMCS: patients who emerged from MCS.