Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 26;7(8):5260–5264. doi: 10.1039/c6sc01087c

Table 2. Optimization of the sp2 C–H carbonylation a .

Inline graphic
Entry Cu source Oxidant Base Solvent Yield b (%)
1 Cu(OAc)2 O2 1,4-Dioxane 17
2 Cu(OAc)2 MnO2 1,4-Dioxane 28
3 Cu(OAc)2 NMO 1,4-Dioxane 33
4 Cu(OAc)2 Ag2O 1,4-Dioxane 19
5 Cu(OAc)2 Ag2CO3 1,4-Dioxane 45
6 Cu(OAc)2 Ag2CO3 DMA 74
7 Cu(OAc)2 Ag2CO3 PhCO2Na DMA 69
8 Cu(OAc)2 Ag2CO3 Py DMA 86
9 Cu(OAc)2 Ag2CO3 Na2HPO4 DMA 90(86)
10 CuCl Ag2CO3 Na2HPO4 DMA 76
11 Ag2CO3 Na2HPO4 DMA 0

aReaction conditions: 3a (0.3 mmol), Cu(OAc)2 (10 mol%), oxidant (2 eq.), base (1 eq.), solvent (2 mL), 140 °C, 24 h.

bYields are based on 3a, determined by 1H NMR using dibromomethane as the internal standard. Isolated yield is in parenthesis.