TABLE 1.
Troubleshooting table.
Step | Problem | Possible reason | Solution |
---|---|---|---|
2, 24, 27 | Low RV transduction efficiency | Insufficient activation of CD8+ T cells |
|
30, 52 | Low RV transduction efficiency | The temperature was not optimal during the procedure | Cells should be kept above room temperature to maintain activity. Do not place cells on ice at any time. Set the centrifuge to 30 °C for spin-transduction |
56, 58 | Low RV transduction efficiency | Low viability of T cells during transduction | Excessive exposure to Polybrene: lower the concentration or shorten the time of exposure to viral supernatant. Consider switching to RetroNectin if use of Polybrene continues to result in low viability |
47 | Low RV transduction efficiency | Residual Percoll particles in cell suspension | Wash the cells at least twice with complete RPMI-1640 before RV transduction |
55 | Low RV transduction efficiency | The wrong RV system was used | Use an ecotropic RV system for standard mouse T-cell experiments |
55 | Low RV transduction efficiency | The RV stock titer was too low | Check the RV titer before starting in vitro T-cell stimulation. Use of high-titer stock (>107 reporter-positive focus-forming units/ml) is recommended |
56 | Low RV transduction efficiency | The wrong tissue-culture plates were used for spin-transduction and incubation | Noncoated plates should be used for spin-transduction |
1 | No visible interface layer or low cell recovery after Percoll separation | The input cell number used was too low | An input cell number of at least 5 × 106 is recommended. Increase the number of spleens if necessary |
30, 42 | No visible interface layer or low cell recovery after Percoll separation | The temperature of the Percoll reagents and centrifugation were not optimal | Leave the Percoll reagents at room temperature for at least 1 h or use a water bath. Make sure that the temperature during centrifugation is set to 25 °C |
40, 42 | No visible interface layer or low cell recovery after Percoll separation | The 30 and 60% (vol/vol) Percoll layers were disturbed | Care must be taken when underlaying 60% (vol/vol) Percoll and moving the tubes to/from the centrifuge. Accelerator and brake should be off during centrifuge |
30, 34 | No visible interface layer or low cell recovery after Percoll separation | 30 and/or 60% (vol/vol) Percoll solutions were not appropriately prepared | Check the reagents. Consider using a density marker if refreshing all reagents fails to solve the problem |
34 | No visible interface layer or low cell recovery after Percoll separation | The combination of 30 and 60% (vol/vol) Percoll is not optimal in the experimental setting | Test whether modifying the Percoll concentration by 5% increments works better |
1 | Low levels of RV-transduced T cells in vivo | Rejection of transferred T cells due to unmatched genetic background | Check the genetic background of the donor mouse and run a test transfer experiment without RV transduction |
55 | Low levels of RV-transduced T cells in vivo | Rejection due to the RV marker | Compare with different RV marker(s) in individual experimental settings. Consider switching RV marker if rejection is suspected |
67 | Low levels of RV-transduced T cells in vivo | The number of transferred T cells was too low | Titrate the optimal cell number for transfer in individual experimental settings |
68 | Low levels of RV-transduced T cells in vivo | Low RV transduction efficiency | Check the RV transduction efficiency on day 2 in vitro |
73 | Low levels of RV-transduced T cells in vivo | Loss of RV-transduced T cells by Histopaque centrifugation during sample preparation | Switch to RBC lysis buffer when preparing single-cell suspension during acute phase |
74 | Low levels of RV-transduced T cells in vivo | Leakage of RV-derived fluorescent marker(s) in intracellular staining application | Add a pre-fixation step with 2% (vol/vol) PFA in PBS between staining surface molecules and permeabilizing steps |