Table 3.
Intervention vs usual careb | Intervention % | Usual care % | AOR (95% CI) |
p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
ASK-P/T | 83.7 | 76.6 | 1.57 (1.07, 2.31) | 0.021 |
ADVISE-P/T | 69.8 | 57.2 | 1.73 (1.30, 2.30) | 0.0002 |
ASSESS-P/T | 78.9 | 61.0 | 2.39 (1.82, 3.14) | <0.0001 |
ASSIST-P/T | 83.6 | 59.8 | 3.43 (2.43, 4.84) | <0.0001 |
All 5A’s c- P/T (visit-averaged) | 13.2 | 14.4 | 0.90 (0.47, 1.70) | 0.739 |
Visit 1 | 21.7 | 10.9 | 2.26 (1.52, 3.36) | <0.0001 |
Visit 2 | 12.3 | 14.1 | 0.85 (0.36, 2.02) | 0.719 |
Visit 3 | 8.2 | 19.2 | 0.38 (0.09, 1.59) | 0.182 |
Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05). N=961 patients with n=1,340 visits.
ARRANGE outcomes were not included as the tablet was not programmed to perform an ARRANGE step.
Odds of self-reported receipt of 5A’s by either the provider and/or tablet in the intervention group compared to provider-delivered 5A’s in the usual care group.
Group-by-visit interaction p-value=0.011.
GEE, generalized estimating equation; 5A’s, Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, and Arrange; P/T, Provider and/or tablet