Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jun 18;55(1):35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.009

Table 3.

GEE Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes Describing Provider and/or Tablet-Delivery of 5A’sa

Intervention vs usual careb Intervention % Usual care % AOR
(95% CI)
p-value
ASK-P/T 83.7 76.6 1.57 (1.07, 2.31) 0.021
ADVISE-P/T 69.8 57.2 1.73 (1.30, 2.30) 0.0002
ASSESS-P/T 78.9 61.0 2.39 (1.82, 3.14) <0.0001
ASSIST-P/T 83.6 59.8 3.43 (2.43, 4.84) <0.0001
All 5A’s c- P/T (visit-averaged) 13.2 14.4 0.90 (0.47, 1.70) 0.739
 Visit 1 21.7 10.9 2.26 (1.52, 3.36) <0.0001
 Visit 2 12.3 14.1 0.85 (0.36, 2.02) 0.719
 Visit 3 8.2 19.2 0.38 (0.09, 1.59) 0.182

Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05). N=961 patients with n=1,340 visits.

a

ARRANGE outcomes were not included as the tablet was not programmed to perform an ARRANGE step.

b

Odds of self-reported receipt of 5A’s by either the provider and/or tablet in the intervention group compared to provider-delivered 5A’s in the usual care group.

c

Group-by-visit interaction p-value=0.011.

GEE, generalized estimating equation; 5A’s, Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, and Arrange; P/T, Provider and/or tablet